Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!



An Interview with the Brotherhood

By Michael Downey

Yesterday, Egypt's most influential opposition group — the officially banned but semi-tolerated Islamist party known as the Muslim Brotherhood — formally backed Mohamed ElBaradei, the secularist Nobel Laureate who has emerged as a leader of the revolutionary movement calling for an immediate end to the rule of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

But this alliance — which would have seemed unlikely prior to the mass protests that have rocked Cairo for the past week — has been developing for some time.  Last summer, while I was studying at the American University of Cairo, I interviewed Khaled Hamza, the editor of the Muslim Brotherhood's official website.  Hamza is considered a leading voice of moderation within the party, and is central to its youth-outreach efforts.  (In a crackdown on the Brotherhood during the run-up to elections in 2008, Hamza was jailed for several weeks.)

When we spoke, it was difficult to imagine that, within months, Mubarak's decades-long rule would be under serious threat.  Still, I was curious to know who Hamza thought could lead the country if Mubarak ever stepped aside or was forced out.

"It's a very hard question," he said. "But we now have cooperation with Dr. ElBaradei." 

I knew that ElBaradei had been reaching out to opposition groups.  But this was the first indication I had that the Brotherhood was formally participating in ElBaradei's efforts.

"He is a very good man," Hamza said of ElBaradei.  "Maybe he is a secular man, but he respects the democratic option and he will leave the people to choose their president and Parliament.  And maybe he'll help Egypt recover."

The Brotherhood was conspicuously absent when the street protests began last week.  Last Monday, the very first day of the protests, I spoke again with Hamza and asked him what role, if any, the Brotherhood had played in launching them.  He said that the Brotherhood, along with the other established parties, had been behind the curve, and that the protests had been the work of young people angry over the murder of a young man by police officers in Alexandria.  "It wasn't until a couple of days later that political parties realized that this was really happening and started to take part in supporting it," he said. 

Some observers argued that the secular nature of the nascent movement indicates that support for the Muslim Brotherhood is not as deep as conventionally believed.  Yet the party is without a doubt a powerful force within Egyptian society, and would surely play an important role in a hypothetical post-Mubarak era.  In my initial interview with Hamza, we discussed many of the issues that would prove most controversial should the Muslim Brotherhood ever become part of a post-Mubarak Egyptian government: Egypt's relationship with Israel and the Palestinians; the Brotherhood's view of women's role in politics and society; and the Brotherhood's conception of an Islamic state. What follows is an edited transcript of that first interview.



What role would the Muslim Brotherhood have in creating a new state if it participated in the political process?

We would take part in Parliament and run in the elections for it. [Under Mubarak's ban on the group, members of the Brotherhood must run for office as independents - Ed.) When people choose the Muslim Brotherhood, the West must understand that the people want it.

So the Brotherhood would support the maintenance of a secular government?

When the Muslim Brotherhood uses the word "secular," it does not mean no religion — we are talking about what we call a "civilized state."

What if an Egyptian extremist group like Islamic Jihad wanted to take part in the elections, would this be allowed?

No, if they want to make a terrorist operation against civilians we would jail them and stop them from participating in the elections. We will only accept the peaceful and democratic way in political life. If they use violence, we would jail them.

Do you support the establishment of sharia (Islamic law) in the way the government of Saudi Arabia has established it?

The Brotherhood does not agree with the monarchy in Saudi Arabia, because it is simply not democratic.

So you believe that there has to be a certain way to put sharia into place, but that establishing it through monarchy or by force is unacceptable? 

Yes, democracy is the only way.

What about the Iranian model?

The Iranians follow the Ayatollah; we do not believe Islam requires a theocracy.  In our view, the ulema (clergy) are only for teaching and education — they are out of the political sphere.  Iran has some good things, such as elections, but we disagree with all the aggression.  We disagree also with the human rights abuses from the government and attacks on the population.

What about groups that would seek to exclude or discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, sex or religion?

No, we are all united. There is no difference between Muslim, Christian, or whatever.

Should women be forced to wear the hijab, as they are in Iran?

No, they must choose.  They should not be forced to wear hijab. We would never push the people to do something they don’t want to.  But if a woman does not wish to wear hijab, there would be law to wear something respectable — not like a prostitute.  Women must choose their way of Islam.

If the Brotherhood were in power in Egypt, what would be the rights of women to participate in politics?  Could a woman serve in Parliament, or as President?

We believe in the complete participation of women in political life — except the presidency.

Except the presidency?  Why is that?

Most ulema agree that the president must be a man. Women can run for any political office except president…In Islam there are ideas and options, and Islam says it is possible [for a woman to serve as President], but for now we choose the other option. We say it is a choice, from the religious thinkers or schools of thought. But there are other options and different choices.  Some [Islamic] scholars say a woman can be President, but the Muslim Brotherhood, now, at this moment, does not agree with this. Maybe after some years they'd accept this.  I think so. For myself, Khaled, I personally think a woman can be President, no problem.

What about relations with Israel?  What would the Brotherhood do regarding the situation between Israel and Palestine?

We think Israel is an occupation force and is not fair to the Palestinians. We do not believe in negotiation with Israel. As the Muslim Brotherhood, we must resist all this. They are an occupation force and we must resist this. Did you see what they do in Gaza, on the flotilla? Israel is a very dangerous force and we must resist.  Resistance is the only way, negotiation is not useful at all.

So would the Muslim Brotherhood, if in a position of government, help groups like Hamas?

Yes, sure.

Do you recognize Israel as a state?


What if Israel were to completely withdraw from the West Bank, a Palestinian state were established, and Jerusalem became a shared capitol.  Then would you recognize Israel?

The political view of the Muslim Brotherhood on Palestine is one state [for] Jews, Muslims, Christians — let's have a democratic election and we will see….We can make something like a secular state and have elections and we can see.


Michael Downey is an undergraduate at Western Washington University, concentrating in Arabic, Islamic history and the Middle East.

[Above: Tahrir Square in Cairo during recent protests.  Image courtesy of Al Jazeera English.]


Anonymous's picture
Ikhwan in any Government would face Hurdles

The Everest-sized obstacle to the US & Mubarak cooperating or co-habitating with the Ikhwan remains the MuslimB’s rejection of the Camp David Accords. Other long-standing MB positions based on religious rather than political beliefs are significant speed bumps, as in MB’s policy toward the Coptic Christians, women’s rights, the application of shari’a in a constitutional context and which school of shari’a thought would be applied. Also in play are international conventions Egypt has signed concerning racial discrimination [1967], discrimination against women [1981], civil and political rights [1982], economic, social and cultural rights [1982], elimination of torture and other cruel and degrading treatment [1986], rights of the child [1990]. Of course, the current Mubarak regime often fails to observe many of these conventions, but the MB would be examined much more closely, perhaps, for infractions than Mubarak.

Anonymous's picture
MB school of Shar'iah

The Muslim Brotherhood is a primarily Egyptian organization. Schools of Shariah depend on GEOGRAPHICAL areas and are not one to choose. The Egyptian schools that are recognized are Shafi'i and Hanafi. The majority are Shafi'i and Egypt has been historically Shafi'i. I think it's likely Shaf'i hope it helped! (P.S: Yemen and Somalia are Shafi'i too, and they implement the fullness of the Shariah) Shafite Fiqh books are Umdat al-salik and Minaj ut Talibin in english. There are many others in Arabic.
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.


Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy

Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.


Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 


When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.

MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.

Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World


To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook