Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting
FOLLOW US

 

 

WORLD POLICY BOOKS

 

In A Deluge of Consequences, the first World Policy e-book, intrepid journalist Jacques Leslie takes us along on a mythic, spell-binding trip to the bucolic kingdom of Bhutan, where the planet's next environmental disaster is set to unfold. 

 

FOCUS ON

The  World Policy Institute understands that policymakers and opinion leaders need creative ways to catalyze innovation and engage wider coalitions in solving some of the world’s biggest challenges.  By working with artists focused on the same issues, this cross-cutting initiative seeks to build a new, collaborative model for social change. 

AddToAny
Share/Save

Haiti: A Step Toward its Dictatorial Past

By Henry "Chip" Carey

The devastation of the January 2010 earthquake is still obvious everywhere you look in Port-au-Prince and that includes its politics. It took Haiti 21 months after the catastrophe to confirm a prime minister. The legislature rejected President Michel Martelly’s two previous nominees, an example of the pattern of un-governability that afflicts Haiti’s “unending democratic transition.” A divided government, or what the French call cohabitation, has been the norm in Haiti in the quarter-century since the end of Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier’s dictatorship. Haiti has been unable to establish a stable political party system and routinely opts for charismatic figures in presidential elections, like the current president, a former compa music star. While the confirmation of the prime minister would normally be a step forward for the country, Martelly’s choice for PM may signal that an autocratic coalition of traditional elites may try to push Haiti back toward the country it was during the nearly 30 years of dictatorship under the Duvaliers.

On October 5, 17 Senators approved Martelly’s nomination of Garry Conille, with nine opposed. A full cabinet and governing plan will also soon be confirmed, and the long overdue task of rebuilding the country can begin. The previous government under former President Rene Preval neglected many duties after the earthquake, including failing to attend meetings with foreign donors, headed by Bill Clinton, to decide how to manage the billions in funds pledged to reconstruct the country. While having a prime minister is important, Martelly chose the wrong man to help the Haitian people.

Martelly nominated Conille as prime minister even though he does not meet the legally mandated residency requirements for the position. If the law is going to be overlooked, then there are many qualified Haitians living in the diaspora who are not the son of Dr. Serge Conille, minister for sports and youth under the Duvalier dictatorship. Martelly chose Conille partly because of his experience working with the United Nations Development Program, which included time liaising with the government of post-earthquake Haiti. However, Conille’s connections suggest sympathy for the reformation of those behind Jean-Claude Duvalier and the coup regime of 1991-1994. Conille is married to a daughter of the late Marc Bazin, a technocrat who served as a minister under Duvalier, and later as prime minister under the civil-military junta that governed for three years after the 1991 coup that exiled President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. When Martelly decided to run for president of Haiti, he apparently turned to remnants of the Duvalier dictatorship to secretly finance his well-oiled, professional campaign. The huge campaign contributions, which appeared to come from nowhere during the election cycle, were not declared, as required by Haiti’s electoral law. The secret contributions could facilitate what could become another nightmare for Haiti.

In return for these contributions, Martelly has clearly reached an understanding with his benefactors to reinstate the army. President Aristide abolished the army in 1994, two months after he returned from exile with the assistance of a U.S. and U.N. peacekeeping mission. During the Duvalier dictatorships of both Papa and Baby Doc, the army intimidated and extorted money from the population. The U.S. does not seem concerned about this happening again, even though some of the same people are in charge.

Jean-Claude Duvalier was permitted to return to the country by the Preval administration just a few months before the recent presidential elections, allowing him to meet the five year residency requirement should he want to run for president four years from now. (Aristide arrived days before the vote for the same reason). Jean-Claude has not faced any apparent legal effort to hold him accountable for his numerous crimes against humanity during his nearly two decades in office. Baby Doc’s son was even given a job in the Martelly administration. Other leaders of the dictatorship and their children have also taken prominent positions throughout the government since Martelly assumed office.

Political appointments since Martelly’s inauguration include Claude Raymond’s son, the current deputy director of immigration. The father was the dreaded chief of army staff and minister of the interior and defense in both Duvalier cabinets. Constantin Mayard-Paul, the attorney for Claude Raymond and Papa Doc’s godson, has a son, Thierry Mayard-Paul, who is the president’s chief of staff. Another brother, Gregory Mayard-Paul, is a legal adviser. Both sons were childhood friends of the president, who has had lifelong connections with the Haitian elite. These key players in the Martelly administration have brought in Duvalierist connections in the Ministry of Finance, including, Josefa R. Gauthier, the daughter of Adrien Raymond, Duvalier’s foreign minister and brother of Claude Raymond. Daniel Supplice, minister of social affairs and ambassador under Duvalier, was coordinator of the Martelly transition team, was part of Aristide’s opposition a decade ago. Health adviser Dr. Pierre Pompee was special ambassador and plenipotentiary to the Holy See under Duvalier.

Martelly’s Duvalierists have also reportedly been advised by Stanley Lucas, the Haiti representative of the International Republican Institute, who, according to the New York Times, orchestrated the armed rebellion against President Aristide in 2003-2004. Following the rebellion, Lucas was removed from his position.

Haiti has a divided government, which means that the head of state (president) and the head of government (prime minister) will try to rule without the support of former President Preval’s Lespwa Party, which has a plurality in the legislature. So how was Conille, the third candidate for prime minister, finally confirmed? The explanation is not difficult to fathom. Conille, the son of a Duvalier minister, enjoys the deep pockets of an authoritarian coalition that hopes to reestablish the dreaded Haitian army that helped cause the terror that defined Duvalier’s reign.

At a recent press conference, Martelly said, “I picked Garry Conille, he is my suggestion,” to counter claims that Conille was the pick because he is the son of a Duvalierist and would bring in support from the old elite. When asked by an AP reporter about his Duvalier connection during last Thursday’s press conference, Conille dodged the question by insulting the AP reporter, saying, “I would have expected you to ask a more intelligent question.” A more intelligent question, in a country like Haiti, could not have been asked.

The Duvalierists will now try to reestablish the army. The U.N. might even train and monitor such a force if asked by the president, who could also ask the U.N. Mission to leave Haiti if the latter does not accept the army’s reinstatement. Of course, the parliament may not agree to a new army, but that would not stop the president from issuing a decree to create it, just as Aristide decreed its abolition in December 1994.

Advocates of the army in the Martelly administration will speak about how the U.N. peace-building mission stigmatizes Haiti by occupying the country with foreign troops. The trouble is that Haiti’s army has a consistent history of suppressing civil society. In the past, the army has been the biggest enemy of democracy in Haiti, and Martelly is advocating the return of an institution that has haunted the country for nearly a century.

Martelly first announced his plan for reestablishing the army at his first press conference in Washington soon after becoming president. The only convincing justification for an army made by Martelly is to overcome Haiti’s stigmatized identity. However, the only other country in Latin America without an army is also its strongest democracy. With no standing army, Costa Rica is the only state in the region to have had no interruptions to its democratic rule. Much more likely are the various nefarious goals that Duvalierists would like to achieve by gaining the means of coercion to produce patronage for a new political movement based on extortion and intimidation, just as Francois “Papa Doc” Duvalier created a national civil militia which quickly became a paramilitary terror force. Duvalier created the force to offset the power of the army, which “selected” him as president in the 1957 election. The neo-Duvalierists now want an army to offset the power of the national police force, which has been improved somewhat under the tutelage of the U.N. peace-building mission. Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier established the Ton Tons Macoutes, a paramilitary force, because he could not control the army. Now, the reverse is being proposed—controlling the National Civil Police established by Aristide with an army loyal to the elected president.

Martelly presumably wants an army that he can control, because he cannot control the police, which have been led by an incorruptible leader for the past seven years. Like Aristide, Martelly would like to pretend to be democratic initially, possibly even giving the U.N. a large role in training the original forces. After a few years, the U.N. could be asked to leave—just as the U.N. mission to the National Civil Police withdrew under Aristide—and Martelly could replace the new army leadership with a Duvalierist crony.

If this happens, the cycle of dictatorship and destruction for the Haitian people will begin again.

*****
*****

Henry "Chip" Carey is Associate Professor of Political Science at Georgia State University in Atlanta. His two forthcoming books are: Privatizing the Democratic Peace: Policy Dilemmas of NGO Peacebuilding (Palgrave MacMillan) and Reaping what you Sow: A Comparative Examination of Torture Reform in the United States, Israel, France and Argentina (Praeger).

[ Photo courtesy of United Nations Development Program]

Share/Save

Anonymous's picture
History & Politicians


Haiti is a small island. Six degrees of separation? It is more like 2-3 in Haiti, particularly when it comes to the educated whether middle-class or elite/bourgeois. Do you think you could find someone to elect to a political office/position that doesn't have ties to some regime that is hated by someone? Probably not. Additionally, there are a lot of rumors that are now posted on the internet, as if they are facts.

President Martelly did not become president easily, he easily was the popular choice, but becoming President wasn't easy. He didn't drop paper fliers out airplanes like Celestin. It was a lean campaign and being new to politics, he made some mistakes.

Dr. Conille didn't become Prime Minister easily either. The old power (INITE), as Mr. Lucas points out, wasn't keen on anyone going into that position. That he was ratified, speaks to his ability to build bridges.

To read Dr. Carey's analysis, I found myself saying "really?" When Dr. Conille was first nominated, many claimed he was Bill Clinton's man. What a simple view to see the world. A person works for someone and now you are there "yes" man? Now, Dr. Carey and Kim Ives as well, claim the government is Duvalierists? Because his father found work under Duvalier? When is a man his own person? When is the past, the past? I am not saying to ignore the past, but you cannot move forward if all one does is look to the past. Sometimes, people or places have such a bad reputation, that even when good things are happening, no one sees it as such because of the negative perception. Haiti is one of these places. I am hopeful that after this next political shift, things will work out.

Now months after this was written, there have been public disputes between Martelly and Conille. As Senator Benoit said, the reason for wanting Dr. Conille out was his push to review contracts where $300M (or more) went. I have known Dr. Conille to be a good man and I may not always agree with him, but I'm not going to make judgments without facts. He does not have any easy job. And his push for making things fair and honest, are to his credit.

Anonymous's picture
Response to Henry "Chip" Carey


Dear Mr. Carey, There was a 25 April 1995 decree that officially de-mobilized the FADH and basically offered a one-time payout to those who were being let go. And the Aristide made apublic announocement of the dissolution of the army on 28 April (see here: http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1995-04-29/news/9504290577_1_aristid...) That's always been the kind final benchmark that I used for the army's demobilization. As we see in this article, even then observers noted that disbanding the FADH permanently would require a constitutional amendment. It is shame that Mr. Aristide did not chose to go down the constitutional road in this instance. If he did so we wouldn'teven need to be having this conversation, I don't think. In terms of MINUSTAH, my view is that it would be best for the UN to significantly refocus its mission in Haiti rather than just pack up and leave, but I found the hostility towards them relatively high when I was in Haiti the other month. All best, MD

Anonymous's picture
Two points of correction


Dear Mr. Carey: Two points: 1) The Haitian army was disbanded, not abolished. The army is still enshrined in Article 263 of the Haiti's 1987 constitution, an article that would need a parliamentary vote to repeal. The army thus has continued to exist legally, albeit only on paper. Had proper constitutional procedure been followed in the first place, a new amendment would be needed to bring the army back, but alas, constitutional procedure was not followed, so all President Martelly has to do is buy some new uniforms and give them guns. He has the constitution on his side. This is what happens when elected presidents try and rule by royal fiat. [I personally think when you have a national police force in dire need of men and equipment, reviving the army is a uniquely bad idea.] 2) The demobilisation happened in April 1995, not 1994. Aristide only returned to Haiti from exile in October 1994. All best, MD

Anonymous's picture
Carey Reply to Deibert


Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Mr. Deibert is correct that Article 263 of the Haitian Constitution provides for an army. Legally, I suppose that it can be argued that the "Forces Armees d'Haiti" were technically only temporarily suspended by Aristide, though his December 1994 decree claimed to abolish the armed forces. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with you on the timing of the army's dissolution. I still believe that Aristide decreed the abolition of the army in December 1994, two months after his return and reinstatement as Haitian president. This occurred, as I clearly recall, right after army headquarters were stormed by soldiers whom he decided had decreed would be discharged and no longer paid. (Years later, some of them did obtain back wages). This attack killed at least four people. Johanna Mendelson Forman's essay, "Security Sector Reform in Haiti, published in "International Peacekeeping" (Vol.13, no.1) confirms the December 1994 abolition of the army: "This last component of the plan, to retain an army of 1500, was rendered null and void on 23 December 1994, when Aristide abolished the army and dissolved the officer corps and incorporated the remaining army members into the IPSF" (the Interim Public Security Force). The latter was a transitional police force created while the UN peacekeeping mission, composed mostly of US troops, provided army/defense services as the new National Civil Police (PNC in French) force was being created during 1994-1995 and which was inaugurated in April 1995, the date to which Mr. Deibert refers. Most, but not all, of the Haitian army's members were demobilized by April 1995, but some were vetted and allowed to join the PNC. By that same moment, most of the UN peacekeeping troops, other than engineering and police training missions remained and were renewed by the UN Security Council every 6-12 months until Aristide’s 2000 election and 2001 inauguration as president. The absence of UN troops during his term facilitated his violent human rights violations, which included extrajudicial executions of journalists and opposition figures, according to credible human rights groups. As I wrote, President Martelly could decree, just as Aristide decreed its abolition, the army’s reinstatement because of his constitutional authority, relying on Article 263. I certainly agree with Mr. Deibert that Haiti has no need for an army, given its other priorities and the threat such an army would pose to democracy and human rights protection in Haiti. Without UN peacebuilding and with a new army, the latter’s legacy and the political conditions that would exist would prompt some of Haiti's elites, which are well represented in the Martelly presidency, would feel legitimated to buy political influence from the amry, based on many historical precedents. There are problems with MINUSTAH, whose mission should not be indefinite. Prior to its departure, MINUSTAH’s shortcomings should be addressed and reforms. To force MINUSTAH out, presumably against the will of both foreign embassies and the UN, which still wants to train the PNC, is to invite the chaos that occurred during the Duvalier dictatorship by reinstating an institution which is likely to undermine democracy and unable to respond to the earthquake nearly as well as the US and MINUSTAH soldiers were able. (Would the new Haitian army have the equipment and logistical capability for such an operation; if it did, then it would be comsuming more than 100% of the current Haitian government's annual budget. Most countries rely on the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs to respond to natural disasters, which kill ten times as many people as are killed in wars by armies and their enemies.) Nor is the solution to get rid of MINUSTAH without finishing its PNC mentoring mission under UNPol, which would risk the chaos, not of Duvalier, but, this time of the second Aristide presidential term, which occurred when the police's neutrality was compromised by the absence of a UN peacebuilding mission and a president seeking a politicized police force. MINUSTAH should reform the national police force, which has been relatively apolitical and stabilizing under both of President Preval's terms, when UN missions were present, albeit in more modest form in the late 1990s than since 1994. For President Martelly to seek an army in order to get rid of MINUSTAH, as argued by Mr. Lucas, is to jeopardize the considerable progress that Haiti has made through international police cooperation, which has been difficult to discern since the January 12, 2010 earthquake and to invite attempts to overthrow or intimidate his elected government.

Anonymous's picture
Mr. Lucas, it's 2011 and


Mr. Lucas, it's 2011 and while information is readily accessible to everyone, I'm still baffled by your foolish assertions at Professor Carey's article. Your lackluster attempt at refuting any of the facts presented by Professor Carey is very pathetic. Let’s analyze some of your assertions: Stanley Lucas stated: Mr. Conille meets the legally mandated residency requirements for Prime Minister The Haitian Constitution declares: To be appointed Prime Minister, a person must: Own real property in Haiti and practice a profession there; have resided in the county for five (5) consecutive years; Stanley Lucas stated: There is nothing in Mr. Conille’s record that indicates he is a Duvalierist. Facts: Mr. Conille is the son of Dr. Serge Conille, minister for sports and youth under the Duvalier dictatorship. I can go on and on correcting your foolish responses, however the facts have already been stated in Professor Carey’s article. Now you may not believe in the Haitian constitution, since you did facilitate the overthrow of your own democratically elected government, but please do not try to insult the rest of us who are well informed of your foolishness. There aren’t any accusations when it comes to describing who you or your work Mr. Lucas. So please do us all a favor and keep your attacks and rhetorical nonsense to your menial blog with pictures of you and ultra right wingers and Hollywood celebs.

Anonymous's picture
Author Reply


I do hope that blogs like mine will let Haitians know that they should be vigilant and that the rulers should know they are being watched by Haitian civil society-- even if most Haitians cannot afford camera phones. I would never have minded a few children of Duvalier-era ministers and ambassadors serving and serving honorably, if they had not proposed the army. This is the major priority of a country in ruins? We are supposed to believe that unlike the past, the new army is suddenly going to behave professionally this time? While the UN is unpopular in Haiti-- at least among some elements, Haiti would have been much, much worse off without MINUSTAH. Just think back to all the kidnappings and political instability until MINUSTAH provided Haiti the opportunity to live normally. Until the earthquake, Haiti was improving on many points, politically and economically. Imagine what the police and new army would have been like without MINUSTAH. Now, absent MINUTSTAH, Haiti almost alone in the developing world is going to create an army that is apolitical and uncorrupt? As I said above, the National Civil Police was doing well until the UN withdrew, and then it became part of Aristide's praetorian guard. The Haitian police has done well, but their ranks are rife with corruption, even without Aristide and with MINUSTAH. My interest in Haiti is not to make Haiti a colony of the UN and the US-- it is to warn that the army would be embedded in a culture of elites who will use it for their own benefit, with the types of methods that they used during the coup regime from 1991-1994, as well as during the 29 year dictatorship, as well as to suppress popular participation, which is why the US established the Garde d'Haiti nearly a century ago. As far as Mr. Lucas' statements about inaccuracies, partisanship and rumor mongering, I stand by all the facts in this blog. I am not linked to any partisan or rumor source in Haiti, as I did not speak with any political actor or commentator before writing this piece.

Anonymous's picture
Haiti: Stanley Lucas's Response to Dr. Henry Carey


Dr. Carey is clearly ill informed. His assertions lack grounding in facts and appear to advancing a very partisan agenda -- while undermining any progress. I see these types of attacks against the Martelly Administration consistently. Political operatives advance conspiracy theories and expose supposed hidden agendas. The reality is that Haiti’s divisions are between and old guard that fears change and a new guard that is making progress by building institutions and being responsive to the people’s priorities. This is a new approach to politics in Haiti which have traditionally only been accountable to a small few in the Groupe de Bourdon business cartel. People like Dr. Carey may not even realize they are being used to advance partisan agendas and further divide our country. While I hesitate to even engage with rumormongers, it is important to ensure that the facts are laid out so I will address a few of the more egregious errors in his analysis. First, Mr. Conille meets the legally mandated residency requirements for Prime Minister according to the Haitian Senate and the House of deputies. Mr. Conille is eminently qualified for the position having worked for 20 years in Haitian politics and led the UN Special Envoy’s office post-earthquake. There is nothing in Mr. Conille’s record that indicates he is a Duvalierist. I know Mr. Conille well and I can assure you – he is focused on the future – not the past. Second, Martelly never turned to the “remnants of the Duvalier dictatorship to secretly finance his well-oiled, professional campaign.” Rather, President Martelly along with thousands of supporters in Haiti and the Diaspora financed his campaign directly because he believed he could make a real difference and represented a new type of Haitian politician. All campaign contributions were donated according to Haiti’s electoral law. Dr. Carey has absolutely no foundation to make his accusations on this front. Third, Dr. Carey asserts that President Martelly reached some super secret agreement with his funders to reinstate the army. In fact, the new Haitian Defense Force is being launched for four very strong and very public reasons: 1. It is a direct request of the Haitian people who are increasingly concerned by the track record UN’s peacekeeping mission in Haiti which has been involved in scandal after scandal, including the introduction of cholera, the murder of a young man in the camps, sex scandals and corruption, as well as most recently the documented rape of a young Haitian man; 2. Haiti is a sovereign country with real needs to protect its borders from drug trafficking and gangs; 3. The police are overwhelmed and need to primarily focus upon domestic issues; and, 4. In all countries, the military helps maintain infrastructure and helps with disaster and emergency response. Haiti suffered a devastating earthquake and had to rely upon the US military for stabilization, rescue and recovery. Our airports and ports were under the control of the US military. Should the Haitian government not be able to respond to these types of crisis themselves? We should have to wait for the US military to arrive? The people are demanding protection and security. President Martelly is planning a modern, efficient and professional army that is being developing in concert with international partners. Fourth, Dr. Carey goes through considerable efforts to link every single Martelly appointment to Duvalier. For example, he states, “Constantin Mayard-Paul, the attorney for Claude Raymond and Papa Doc’s godson, has a son, Thierry Mayard-Paul, who is the president’s chief of staff. Another brother, Gregory Mayard-Paul, is a legal adviser.” What? He states that another advisor was the Ambassador to the Holy See under Duvalier. So everyone who worked for Duvalier or Aristide should be shut out of government? Me. Thierry Mayard Paul 50 years old and Me Gregory Mayard Paul 46 never hold public office in Haiti until now. The two brothers owned a successful private law firm. Thierry served a few months pro bono in a commission hired by Preval to reform the judicial system. Dr. Carey surely does not understand the situation in Haiti given a comment as preposterous as this. There are very few qualified and experienced government officials in Haiti. Just because one may have worked under a previous regime does not indict them. There are reformers within every system. It seems Dr. Carey is advocating some sort of a witch hunt in Haiti. We prefer not to go that route and follow his derided path of “cohabitation”. In fact, many many advanced democracies in this world have competing political groups, including the US, the UK, and Canada. A democracy incorporates all voices. Fifth, Dr. Carey’s reporting on me was lazy and inaccurate. I never orchestrated an armed rebellion. I trained all of Haiti’s political parties on how to operate more effectively; observed elections; and worked with civil society groups to help them effectively message their platforms. I was never “removed” from my position at the International Republican Institute. After 15 years at the Institute, I resigned and launched my own Washington Democracy Project. Sixth, Dr. Carey’s lazy analysis continues when he states that the reasons for Mr. Conille’s acceptance by the Haitian parliament are “not difficult to fathom”. He goes on to hurl accusations that Mr. Conille wants to reinstate terror at the hand of an army because his father was a minister under Duvalier. How incredibly ridiculous. Mr. Conille has broad based support because of his track record in Haiti and because he represents a new future for Haiti. From rumor-mongering to fear-mongering, Dr. Carey writes baseless accusation after accusation to try to convince people that President Martelly’s efforts to restore Haiti’s sovereignty, protect its borders and bolster emergency readiness by launching a new Haitian Defense Force are somehow part of a grand plan to reinstate (the very sick see: http://solutionshaiti.blogspot.com/2011/01/duvalier-returns-to-haiti-mer... ) Duvalier. Perhaps Dr. Carey prefers to keep Haiti dependent upon other countries, but Haitians prefer to be free and independent rather than continuing to rely upon the generosity of the internationally community. We are trying to move toward self-reliance and independence through good governance. Why would you find ways to undermine that? I will always welcome debate and discussion on the facts, but will always reject partisan rumor-mongering such as this. Please do better to build a constructive, fact-based debate if you care about the future of Haiti, Dr. Carey.

Anonymous's picture
Haiti: Dr. Carey assertions lack grounding in facts


Dr. Carey is clearly ill informed. His assertions lack grounding in facts and appear to advancing a very partisan agenda -- while undermining progress. I see these types of attacks against the Martelly Administration consistently. Political operatives advance conspiracy theories and expose supposed hidden agendas. The reality is that Haiti’s divisions are between and old guard that fears change and a new guard that is making progress by building institutions and being responsive to the people’s priorities. This is a new approach to politics in Haiti which have traditionally only been accountable to a small few in the Groupe de Bourdon business cartel. People like Dr. Carey may not even realize they are being used to advance partisan agendas and further divide our country. From rumor-mongering to fear-mongering, Dr. Carey writes baseless accusation after accusation to try to convince people that President Martelly’s efforts to restore Haiti’s sovereignty, protect its borders and bolster emergency readiness by launching a new Haitian Defense Force are somehow part of a grand plan to reinstate (the very sick) Duvalier. Perhaps Dr. Carey prefers to keep Haiti dependent upon other countries, but Haitians prefer to be free and independent rather than continuing to rely upon the generosity of the internationally community. We are trying to move toward self-reliance and independence through good governance. Why would you find ways to undermine that? I will always welcome debate and discussion on the facts, but will always reject partisan rumor-mongering such as this. Please do better to build a constructive, fact-based debate if you care about the future of Haiti, Dr. Carey. While I hesitate to even engage with rumormongers, it is important to ensure that the facts are laid out so I address a few of the more egregious errors in his analysis on my blog http://www.solutionshaiti.blogspot.com/

Anonymous's picture
Correction to Accusations Against IRI


The accusations made against IRI in The New York Times have been thoroughly refuted and facts can be read at http://ow.ly/6V0em. The facts of IRI’s work in Haiti can be read at http://ow.ly/6V05l.
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
World Policy on Facebook