Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!



The South Caucasus: A Political Earthquake Zone

 By Tanya Melich

Since gaining their independence from the Soviet Union 20 years ago, Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia have struggled to prove to themselves and the outside world that they can determine their own fate.

Such hopes are fading.

These tiny South Caucasus countries live in a political earthquake zone, surrounded by the region's giants—Russia, Turkey, and Iran. In exchange for peace and modest prosperity for themselves and their citizens, South Caucasus leaders appear to be making major governmental decisions that benefit Russia and—to a lesser extent—Turkey. (Any benefits to Iran are harder to ascertain.)

These regional giants are ratcheting up the action. They want to control the region’s oil wealth and exploit its potentially rich minerals. They know that profits lie in transporting Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan’s oil to European markets and that the easiest pipeline routes are through the South Caucasus. They also know that political leverage will go to those who control the oil spigot to Europe.

The Southern Caucasus countries haven’t broken the cultural hold that Russia has on them, nor have they made it clear that’s what they want. Each country has a different response to its former Soviet master, and the middle-aged and elderly exhibit a depression that comes from having lived in a police state. To them, no one from the outside can be trusted, but better the Russians than some group they don’t know.

Most say how glad they are to be free of the Soviets but then wax nostalgic about the excellence of the Soviet educational system and how they love Lermontovo’s poetry and Pushkin’s novels.

The predominant language heard in all three countries is Russian. Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia have separate languages and unusual alphabets, and few can speak either of the other two. Most business transactions among these three groups are in Russian and occasionally in English, especially in Georgia which mandated that schools teach English as the second language.

Even after the five-day war against Russia in 2008, most Georgians know their future depends on reasonable relations with their neighbor. Georgia lost its areas of Abkhazia and Southern Ossetia when both declared their independence and are now home to Russian troops guaranteeing it.

Present tensions between the two countries revolve around Russia's attempt to join the World Trade Organization (WTO). Unanimous consent is required for WTO entry. Georgia, a member, refuses to accept Russia into the WTO without an agreement providing trade transparency on Russia’s borders with Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Georgia.

The parties are furiously negotiating, and an agreement is expected. Russia is thought to prefer peace with its neighbors as it prepares for the 2014 Winter Olympics, which are being hosted in Sochi on the Black Sea and next to the Georgian border.

But, after the Olympics, no one knows what Putin might do to consolidate Russia's influence over Georgia.

For the moment, Russia and Georgia barely speak. Georgia has friends in the West, but that friendship is limited to student exchanges, foreign aid, and investments. The country’s other main leverage is through control over the pipelines that cross its land.

Some Azeris also have a schizoid confusion toward Russia. In 2011 Azerbaijan’s singing duet won the Eurovision Song Contest, and as a result, the contest will be in Baku in 2012. For the occasion, the Azeri government and oligarchs have built three gigantic glass buildings topped with a tulip design for the Contest’s performances.

What is strange is that these wild, unsacred Disneyesque showcases are directly across the street from the most sacred space in Azerbaijan, the Martyrs Lane. This memorial honors the Azeris who demonstrated against the Soviets in 1990 and were mowed down by Soviet troops who originally came to establish order between the Armenians and Azeris of Baku. It was the beginning of the new Azerbaijan state. 

Yet it is not the Russians, but the Armenians that contemporary Azeris hate.

The memorial also commemorates those Azeris who died from 1992 to ’94 in the conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh. When a ceasefire was established, the Armenians had won the territory but over a million people from both sides lost their homes and 20,000 had died.

Armenians and Azeris lived together in both countries for centuries. But now the border is closed, and neither side speaks to each other. The hatred is palpable. 

My Baku guide told me that it was just a matter of time before oil-rich Azerbaijan goes to war to get back Nagorno-Karabakh. Both Azerbaijan and Armenia have bought arms from Ukraine.

Armenia seems to feel the same. Our guide in Yerevan often talked about how much she hated the Azeris, and while she did not want it, she expected war. Implicit in the conversations of people in both countries was the assumption that only the Russians would be able to keep the peace.

Armenia is a sad place. Its population is around 3.2 million, and with its stagnant economy, many are leaving. It has no official relations with Turkey and none with Azerbaijan. Armenia is landlocked and, except through Georgia, has no way to export its produce. Tourism is its only viable industry and even that is modest. The country survives because of the vitality of the Armenian diaspora, thought to be at least five million people, based in Russia, Europe, and North America.

There are few signs that the region is working toward a sustainable peace although there are half-hearted conversations that the EU will help when a crisis occurs.

In mid-October, the Atlantic Council Task Force on Georgia “argued for intensified domestic reform and a new sense of common purpose and clarity from the United States and Europe to work toward a democratic Georgia embedded in the institutions of the West.”  

These are admirable goals, but for the foreseeable future, Georgia and its South Caucasus neighbors have their hands full. They will try to stop Russia from gobbling them up and try to entice Turkey and Iran to help them.

The wiser leaders of Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia know they are stuck with their neighbors. They continue—in the long tradition of their part of the world—to balance the anger of their citizens for war against Russian, Turkish and Iranian ambition.

They have a difficult challenge. Don’t be surprised if war breaks out in one or several of these countries when the Sochi Olympics are over.


Tanya Melich just returned from the Southern Caucasus. She is a political analyst and author with decades of experience in U.S. politics including providing foreign policy research for U.S. political candidates. She is a former staff writer for the Foreign Policy Association. 

[Photo courtesy of Bohan Shen]

[CORRECTION: The initial version of the piece misstated the population of Armenia. It is estimated at around 3.2 million.]


Anonymous's picture
The South Caucasus

There are several factual mistakes in this piece: 1) The population of Armenia is 3 million (not 900,000). . Georgians are also migrating. 2) Tourism is hardly Armenia`s only viable industry. Mining, agriculture, diamond cutting, software development are more significant than tourism. Armenia`s GDP on a PPP per capita basis is higher than Georgia`s. 3) Armenia is embargoed by Azerbaijan and Turkey but Georgia is not its only open border as Iran is an increasingly important trade route.

Anonymous's picture
This is what happens when

This is what happens when third side 'analysts' don't do enough reading before writing about regions and subjects they have no idea about. Apparently, even visiting the South Caucasus countries didn't help the author to fill in the lack of some basic knowledge on the region. This makes a completely unprofessional article with lots of stereotypes and mistakes in figures, facts and ideas in general.

Anonymous's picture
Your Opinion piece

Dear Tanya, I'm shocked at your 900,000 figure for Armenia. Yerevan alone has some 1.2 million inhabitants, while the two other large cities combined has nearly 300,000 people. Atleast another million inhabit the dozens of other cities and towns as well as several hundred villages. Where do you get your number figure? Even Azeri and Turkish propaganda often cite 1.5 or 2 million, let alone your statistics. But somehow your preceding statement labeling Armenia a "sad place" may indeed validate my doubts about your objectivity and more, which I would rather avoid discussing before I read more of your works. You do offer some interesting points otherwise, but frankly, I would question much of your statements and figures based on the above mentioned error or deliberate falsification, as would any objective expert and scholar on the region. Regards Harry Semerdjian
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.


Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy

Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.


Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 


When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.

MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.

Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World


To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook