Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!



The Middle East's Childish Games

By Andrew Wilson

Gaza rains rockets down on Israel, and Israel bombs Gaza. Abbas succeeds in gaining membership for Palestine in UNESCO, and Israel announces it is fast-tracking new settlements. The familiar, desultory rhythm of tit-for-tat continues in the Middle East.

With Israelis and the Palestinians acting like boys in a schoolyard engaged in a game of one-upmanship, where is the grown-up in the room? Right now, it looks like it’s Egypt, which a few weeks ago deftly mediated the prisoner exchange with Hamas that freed Gilad Shalit and now has arranged for a stand-down of the missile strikes from Gaza.

Here is a surprising benefit of the Arab Spring—that Egypt should suddenly become the most responsible party in the Middle East. More than Israel or the Palestinians, Egypt appears to be the country that sees peace as a compelling national interest.

It is clear that continued unilateral actions by Israel and the Palestinian Authority, whether at construction sites in the settlements or in the halls of the UN, are nothing but steps to strengthen their positions within the paradigm of conflict. Palestinian efforts at the UN are looking more and more unseemly, and international support for is diminishing. President Mahmoud Abbas’s address to the UN on September 23 that brought the Palestinian narrative to the attention of the world was a laudable act of statesmanship. But his actions since then, turning the UN and its agencies into battlefields for mobilizing international opprobrium on Israel, only serve to continue, and even escalate, a conflict that can only be solved by negotiations between the parties.

It is widely agreed that the long-term interests of Israel and Palestine are best served by a two-state solution. The two sides need to sit down together and arrive at an agreement that will give Palestine a workable state. The paradigm of genuine negotiations is to offer meaningful concessions . It is nothing like the current paradigm of unilateral action and reaction, which only creates greater obstacles.

Recent revelations by Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in her new memoir, No Higher Honor, indicate how close to an agreement the two sides had come in 2008. Ehud Olmert’s so-called “napkin map” as published recently by Al-Jazeera, while by no means ideal, was at least a reasonable first offer by one side. Olmert, the Israeli Prime Minister from 2006 to 2009, attempted to lower the barriers to an agreement by making a reasonable offer to Abbas, one that included concessions.

The goal of two states living side-by-side in peace is worth the risk of momentary vulnerability that negotiations entail. By Rice’s account, Olmert took such a risk at the end of his tenure as Prime Minister. It is time for Abbas to take that risk as well. While he may believe he needs to win political points by grandstanding at the UN, he should at the same time be signaling that he is ready to sit down for sober talks under the aegis of the Quartet, which is made up of the U.S., the UN, the EU, and Russia.

By the same token, the U.S. by threatening to penalize the Palestinians for their efforts at the UN is only buying into the tit-for-tat paradigm. Rather, it should be employing all available tools to pressure Israel and the Palestinians to work with the Quartet and begin to negotiate. This was the sense of former U.S. national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski’s proposal from a September 30 interview on Bloomberg TV, where he suggested that the U.S. could introduce its own UNSC resolution that would be supportive of Israel but also call for a homeland for the Palestinians, linked to the resumption of negotiations:

If instead of [vetoing the Palestinian resolution in the UNSC] we introduce a resolution welcoming the existence of a democratic Jewish state in Israel - explicitly - at the same time saying the Palestinians are entitled to something similar, negotiations should be resumed on the basis of et cetera, et cetera, as Obama said, ’67 frontiers, and the United States and the Quartet propose that, then quietly the Israelis at the last moment could even vote for it."

Getting the two sides to negotiate should be the focus of U.S. policy, not reacting to the show at the UN.

Peace negotiations can begin even in spite of continued conflict. Even if Gaza launches more missiles and Israel undertakes more retaliatory airstrikes, negotiations can begin. Even as Abbas pushes for more recognition by the UN, negotiations can begin. Even as Israel continues building settlements, negotiations can begin.

When the paradigm changes from fighting to negotiating, those insults from the other side—vestiges of the old paradigm—are no longer as significant. They can be safely ignored in the interests of moving on towards the common goal.


Andrew Wilson is co-author of the Citizens Proposal for a Border between Israel and Palestine (, an independent initiative to draw a map based on the principles of fairness, contiguity, access, minimizing dislocation of the population, and enhancing conditions for economic development.

[Photo courtesy of Flickr user Rusty Stewart]


Anonymous's picture
Israel’s “childishness”

"Israel bombs Gaza." I don’t think retaliating for illegal rocket attacks is childish. Should Israel sit back and do nothing while her innocent civilians die and the local economy and daily life of Southern Israel is severely hampered? "Abbas succeeds in gaining membership for Palestine in UNESCO." Yes he did so in direct violation of the Oslo Accords if the Palestinians are unwilling to keep their past commitments why should Israel restrain herself and keep hers when it does her no good to do so? Egypt is not acting like a grownup they can’t even protect the embassies of Cairo they see peace as a compelling national interest only because they want to continue the flow of the millions the U.S. gives it for keeping the peace. The Palestinians are going to have to realize that they are not going to get their 100% “ideal” state sacrifices are going to have to be made by both sides not just by Israel. Condoleezza Rice in her book also clearly puts the blame on the Palestinians for the collapse in peace talks. You are right we should not let preconditions hinder peace talks Israel knows this they have called for peace talks without preconditions many time now let Abbas listen.

Anonymous's picture
Andrew Wilson's Childish MiddleEast Games

Mr Wilson's whole premise is encapsulated in this wild statement that "It is widely agreed that the long-term interests of Israel and Palestine are best served by a two-state solution." Widely agreed by whom?-by the US?, Turkey? the Saudis?, certainly not by the homeless of Palestine who want their stolen land and homes back. The concept of two state solution is well dead: continued appropriation of Palestinian lands by the Israelis mean that a stand-alone Palestinian state could not ever exist in any meaningful way. To portray this war of occupation by the Israelis as some kind of tit-for-tat between two equal adversaries is not naive; it is simply lies. Israel is the most powerful state in the middle east in terms of firepower; the Gaza Strip and the West Back are the weakest. "Negotiations" are therefore actually impossible when one of the players holds all the cards, and is supported in whatever it chooses to do by the most powerful state on earth. I am unsure whether Andrew Wilson is actually paid as an Israeli proxy to regurgitate this nonsense or whether he actually believes it. Either way it is a sad indictment on journalism. It is sufficient to look at the history of the last 60 years of Israel's brutal occupation of Palestinian lands to know the truth.
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.


Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy

Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.


Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 


When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.

MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.

Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World


To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook