Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!



The Nationalist Fervor of the Turkish Film Industry

By Nick Danforth

Over the past three months, a Turkish film entitled Conquest 1453 has broken box office records with its full-blooded celebration of the Ottoman capture of Constantinople. High-tech CGI, lavish costumes, and elaborate battle scenes give the Byzantine Empire's last days the epic sweep they deserve. Even the marketing campaign draws on the rivalry with the West, with its promotional material bragging that Conquest 1453 had a larger budget than the Ridley Scott/Orlando Bloom crusader flick, Kingdom of Heaven—and used twice (twice!) as many replica siege towers. With magnanimous Ottoman Sultans pitted against enraged priests threatening to drown the godless Turks in their own blood, this movie highlights everything that is ugly about religiously driven, anti-Western nationalism in Turkey.

So at a time when the West is counting on Turkish cooperation to solve particularly thorny policy problems in Syria and Iran, why doesn't the success of a movie like this rattle Western hopes? The answer lies in Turkey’s proud tradition of mixing over-the-top nationalism and sensible foreign policy.

The country's first big-budget movie about the conquest of Istanbul came out in 1952, the year Turkey joined NATO. Unknowingly, visitors to Istanbul have probably passed the tomb of the Sofu Baba, an Ottoman warrior whose spirit—according to legend—visited Turkish soldiers fighting alongside Americans in the Korean War. Later, in the 70s, the same popular actor who won minor notoriety for his role in the famously bad Turkish Star Wars, also made his own equally over the top conquest-of-Istanbul movie. It ends with him pulling an arrow out of his chest, throwing it into the eye of a Byzantine general and crying "this is for Muslims everywhere."

In evaluating the contemporary implications of Conquest 1453 and other intensely nationalistic movies alike, what stands out is how quickly their political meaning can shift in accordance with regional developments.

During the Cold War, Turks frequently explained to their American allies that when they cursed infidels, they were not referring to Americans, who were “good Christians,” but rather the Soviets, who—as “godless Communists”—were the real nonbelievers.

The current demonization of Israel offers another example of the way a country's role in Turkey's national narrative can change. During the '90s, the ideological foundation of Turkey's alliance with Israel was never just about secularism. It also reflected a shared belief that the threat of  terrorism was an existential one that had to be crushed by force before addressing liberal concerns about democratic values. In this era, Israel was portrayed as a supporter of Turkey in the face of Western humanitarians, whose talk of minority rights revealed them to be in league with violent Kurdish separatists.

Turkey's increasingly liberal approach to the Kurdish issue has been accompanied by rising criticism and more hateful rhetoric of Israel's anti-terror policies. The 2006 film Valley of the Wolves—the last big-budget Turkish film to make headlines in the U.S. for its anti-Western excesses—featured a doctor surgically removing the hearts from his Muslim victims and sending them to Tel Aviv.

In respect to Syria, the Assad regime's recent transition from Turkey’s friend to foe has been particularly dramatic. For years, U.S. critics pointed to Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party's reconciliation with Syria as evidence of its Islamically-driven foreign policy. Now, as Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan steps up his heated criticism of Assad, there are suspicions that his religious background has led him to sympathize with the Sunni, who make up most of the opposition to Assad's Alawite regime in Damascus.

Beyond religion, there is likely a degree of personal pique in Erdogan's anger directed towards both Israel and Syria. In 2008, Erdogan felt betrayed by the Israeli government when they attacked Gaza in the midst of concluding a Syrian-Israeli peace deal. Today, it appears that Erdogan feels that the Syrian regime’s brutality—after his government went out on a diplomatic limb to embrace Assad as a reformer and help end Syria's isolation— is a slap in the face. Along with religion and personality, a certain patriotic self-righteousness of the sort promoted by films like Conquest 1453, has perhaps played a role in heightening Turkey's justifiable sense of outrage at Assad's atrocities.

However, in deciding how aggressively to confront the Syrian regime, Turkish leaders—like their American counterparts—are well aware that while triumphalist nationalism makes for a satisfying cinematic experience, it can also make for messy foreign interventions.



Nick Danforth is a doctoral student in history at Georgetown University.

[Photo Curtesy of Shutterstock]


Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.


Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy

Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.


Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 


When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.

MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.

Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World


To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook