Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting
FOLLOW US

 

 

WORLD POLICY BOOKS

 

In A Deluge of Consequences, the first World Policy e-book, intrepid journalist Jacques Leslie takes us along on a mythic, spell-binding trip to the bucolic kingdom of Bhutan, where the planet's next environmental disaster is set to unfold. 

 

FOCUS ON

The  World Policy Institute understands that policymakers and opinion leaders need creative ways to catalyze innovation and engage wider coalitions in solving some of the world’s biggest challenges.  By working with artists focused on the same issues, this cross-cutting initiative seeks to build a new, collaborative model for social change. 

AddToAny
Share/Save

Trouble in the UN Press Core: Is One Reporter a Bully or a Crusader?

By Richard Armstrong

Covering the inner-workings of the United Nations, the scrappy news site Inner City is owned and written by Matthew Lee. Despite the relatively small operation, Lee is a tenacious—some say abrasive—journalist who breaks more than his share of stories. But in recent weeks, the UN Correspondents Association (UNCA)—the professional association that represents reporters covering the UN—is considering his expulsion, accusing him of bullying and unethical behavior. Lee claims competitors from the big media groups are punishing him for scooping them and that the UNCA wants to silence him. The spat is emblematic of the closeness of UN reporters to the organizations they cover and what happens when one speaks out against the UN clubhouse.

Lee has beaten his competitors to the punch on numerous occasions since gaining accreditation at the UN in 2006. He has broken stories such as the Ecuadorian diplomatic pouches that were used to smuggle cocaine, the dust up between the security staff of Ban Ki Moon and Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, and the deployment of UN observers to Libya. The latter story sparked outrage in Libya and caused the transitional government to change its mind and back about of the arrangement, leaving the UN embarrassed

The deployment would have consisted of unarmed UN military observers and police. It was hoped that the police would help Libyan security forces regain order, while also ensuring that those linked to the former regime were not abused. When Lee revealed the UN document outlining this plan, the transitional government changed its mind and said it did not want any foreign soldiers in their country. It was an embarrassment for the UN that Libya had so publicly said it did not require their help. The Wall Street Journal published a story several weeks earlier about a briefing of the plan. But Lee was the first to publish the detailed document outling the plan.

Despite the controversy of his stories, according to Lee his competitors have picked up his exclusives—frequently without crediting him. In March, Lee published a story about Jeffrey Feltman, a White House official who was moved to a top UN position. Seven weeks later, Reuters wrote a piece on the move. One of the contributing reporters was Louis Charbonneau, one of Lee’s competitors at Turtle Bay. Lee believed he had been un-credited yet again and confronted Charbonneau. This incident, along with a history of similar disputes with colleagues, caused the UNCA to appoint an investigative committee to look into accusations of aggressive behavior by Lee.

As the dispute escalated, Lee has frequently emailed his accusers and even contacted their bosses at their agencies. He also has reprinted old stories he previously wrote about the other UN reporters—which appear to be the main problem his competitors have with him. These include a story about the UNCA president, Giampaolo Paoli, having close ties to the Sri Lankan government.

The central accusation is that Paoli rented an apartment to Palitha Kohona, a Sri Lankan who is now the Permanent Representative to the UN. The financial relationship between Paoli and Kohona seems to be above board and was only that of a tenant and landlord over seven years ago. At the time Kohona was a UN official, not a representative of Sri Lanka. Lee has also asserted that an Agence France Presse correspondent attempted to punish him for writing a story that embarrassed the Élysée Palace.

Lee seems somewhat prone to conspiracy theories. He says the accusations against Paoli has led the UNCA to stir up hatred against him. While Lee has been threatened by commenters in online message boards, the claim that the UNCA is responsible for them appears baseless. The UNCA isn’t likely to encourage Sinhalese extremists to threaten a UNCA member they’re in a dispute with. They have tried to keep the investigation under wraps and stirring up threats against the reporter in question would defeat this goal. In a statement to reporters, UNCA says the accusation that they helped engineer threats is “a false and damaging claim” and that the “UNCA condemns in the strongest terms all threats against any journalist.”

Lee has a point when he argues that his competitors recycle his stories without due credit and that he sometimes embarrasses the UN bureaucracy. But Lee is wrong that he is being censored. The censorship claim rests on the fact that the UNCA has asked him to stop writing about his colleagues. While UNCA should not dictate what he writes about, Lee loses credibility through his ad hominem writings on colleagues, which have been dubious at best. While Lee should be able to write a story on any topic he wishes, including his fellow reporters, those stories should be based on important issues such as conflict of interest and on fact. Lee’s stories in fact do appear to harass his accusers and asking him to stop is not out of line.

One member of the executive committee was brought to tears when recounting how Lee mentioned her on his blog in what she felt was an offensive and intimidating way. She went to her boss, who complained directly to the UNCA about Lee’s accreditation.

Lee argues that the Investigation Committee set up against him is illegitimate. In an email he said that he didn’t know the charges against him and that members of the committee were being “hand-picked” by Pioli. Other members of UNCA share Lee’s view that the organization should not be investigating other reporters. Luiz Rampelotto, a photographer for Europe Newswire resigned from his position on the Executive Committee of the UNCA because of the investigation. In an email, he said, “I will never go against a journalist because he is talking bad about you and you don’t like it! That was just outrageous when they ask me for that! I use to have great respect for UNCA but now … [to] hell with that dictatorship … The members [don’t] have any idea they are responsible for it.” Rampelotto claims the reason for the investigation is that Lee frequently scoops his colleagues.

Could the UNCA investigation threaten Lee’s UN accreditation? A spokesperson of MALU says that the UNCA investigation would not “directly influence” their decision on reaccrediting Lee. However, the guidelines state that accreditation is given on the basis of agreement between the Department of Public Information, the office of the spokesperson of the Secretary General, the Office of the president of the General Assembly, and the UNCA.

A voluntary press association should not have an impact on whether or not its members are accredited by the organization they cover. While the UNCA has every right to kick out a bully from its club, the UN is under-covered as it is, and a muckraking reporter like Lee will keep the mainstream reporters on their toes. Although Lee may be someone that few of us would want to work with, an institution like the UN could use an outsider who enjoys highlighting its missteps.

*****

*****

Richard Armstrong is an Editorial Assistant at World Policy Journal

 

(Photo courtesy of Flickr user Utenriksdept)

 

CORRECTED: The Wall Street Journal published a story on the plan to deploy UN observers in Libya on June 29th, before Inner City Press published the leaked UN report

Share/Save

Anonymous's picture
Rubbish


"...the deployment of UN observers to Libya. The latter story sparked outrage in Libya and caused the transitional government to change its mind and back about of the arrangement, leaving the UN embarrassed" This is total BS. The story was already broken in the WSJ in April, and Ian Martin, the UN rep in Libya, said through a spokesman that the Libyan rebels had already rejected his contingency plan for post-Gadhaffi Libya before his document was leaked to Lee...

Anonymous's picture
The silliness of Inner City Press


Regarding the last comment -- Not only that, the Libya document was out of date, obsolete by the time Lee published it. It was freely available at the UN but no one bothered to report on it because it was out of date and out of touch with reality. It was about a UN proposal for truce monitors, something the Libyan rebels never wanted because they were convinced they were going to win the war, which they did. The winning side in a war would NEVER accept truce monitors because they don't want a truce. They want victory. So the suggestion that Lee's belated reporting on it caused the Libyan rebels to give up plans for a truce monitoring force is silly at best, dishonest at the worst. Also, the Reuters, AP and others' stories on Feltman in May were written out of Washington, not the UN, after Feltman himself briefed reporters there. The suggestion that anyone "stole" Lee's story 7 weeks after the fact is absurd. All it shows is that no one in the State Dept press corps regularly reads Inner City Press. Besides, UN Pass Blue reported on Feltman getting the UN job after Lee and before AP, Reuters and others reported on it may. Here's the link: http://passblue.com/2012/04/30/a-possible-replacement-for-pascoe/

Anonymous's picture
The claim that Lee got the UN


The claim that Lee got the UN to change its plans for Libya is not accurate. In first instance, the WSJ had written the same story before Lee. The document that was published by Lee clearly states that any deployment of UN troops was contingent on the Libyan authorities requesting this.
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
World Policy on Facebook