Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!



One Small Step for Space Technology, One Giant Step for Space Policy

By Frank White

When the Dragon capsule built by SpaceX docked with the International Space Station, it was a triumph not just for spacecraft but for space policy. The howls of dismay at the canceling of the shuttle program had drowned out the cheers of those who welcomed the administration’s emphasis on private enterprise.

President Barack Obama’s opponents have roundly criticized him for being a strong government advocate who doesn’t understand the importance of the private sector. Yet it is during his presidency that we have reversed decades of government-centric space policy by actively encouraging a wider role for free enterprise in Low Earth Orbit. Specifically, the administration confirmed that private companies like SpaceX would provide the spacecraft that resupply the space station and eventually send American astronauts there. The politics of the situation created some strange bedfellows, with conservative Republicans lobbying to continue what amounted to a massive government program. Some Apollo astronauts entered the fray and argued against the new policy in part because it abandoned a return to the moon.

When covering the transformation of the space program, the media got it wrong by amplifying the negative comments and overlooking the positive aspects of the new policy. As a result, I found that many people would say to me, “Oh, you’re interested in space exploration? Too bad we don’t have a space program any more.” What these people did not realize is that the U.S. does have a space program, it’s just very different from the old one. The new space policy is better suited to an age of budget austerity and the idolization of the entrepreneur.

Critics failed to note that the administration had not developed its space policy out of whole cloth. Rather, it had relied on the U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee—known as the Augustine Committee—led by the highly respected Norman Augustine, retired chairman and chief executive officer of the Lockheed Martin Corporation and a former undersecretary of the Army. The Committee’s function was to make recommendations on what to do in the post-Bush space exploration era. It noted that the U.S. human spaceflight program “seems to be on an unsustainable trajectory.” NASA had been saddled with a commitment to return to the moon while also laying the groundwork for a manned mission to Mars. Realizing that NASA could not possibly do everything that was asked of it, the committee laid out a number of scenarios.  Among these, they suggested that NASA focus on deep space exploration, including missions to the asteroids and Mars, leaving the building of infrastructure in Low Earth Orbit to others. In this scenario, there was no return to the moon. The Obama administration largely followed the committee’s lead, eventually resulting in the flight of the Dragon and entrepreneurs seizing the opportunity to open up a new frontier.

The Apollo mission was extremely important because the views of Earth from space provided to us by the astronauts changed how we saw our place in the universe. This “Overview Effect” helped give birth to the environmental movement and has supported an emerging belief in global citizenship that transcends national boundaries. For this reason, I still believe that President Kennedy made the most important space policy decision of all time when he committed America to go to the moon. But President Obama’s decision to give the private sector a chance ranks second, because it changes everything once again. From now on, what humans do beyond the Earth’s atmosphere will not be driven only by government priorities but also by the entrepreneurial spirit.

This is critical because private enterprise seeks to provide services to more and more people, driving down costs in the process. Most observers of the space program agree that the key to opening up the “high frontier” is lowering the cost of access to Low Earth Orbit. What we call “space” is actually closer to the surface of the Earth than New York is to Boston. While it is relatively inexpensive to put six people in a car and drive from one of those cities to the other, it was very expensive for the government to load six astronauts onto the shuttle and send them into orbit.

Despite talking about lowering costs of space travel for more than 50 years, government space agencies have failed to do it, and as a result, only a total of about 500 people have actually had the spaceflight experience. While this has already exerted a powerful influence on our worldview and self-identity because of the Overview Effect, the impact could be much greater. Consider what will happen if 500 people or more are flying in a year. This quantitative change could trigger a qualitative shift in how we think about the world and our place in it.

In the past, opening up new physical or mental frontiers has been most effective through public/private partnerships. The Internet is a good example. Originally developed by the government, it is now a hotbed of entrepreneurial ventures, bringing the benefits of computing and networking to billions of people worldwide.

It should come as no surprise, then, that the first person to capitalize on the new American space policy is Elon Musk, who made his fortune as co-founder of Paypal. The kind of partnership that created the Internet and its amazing applications can now be utilized in space exploration and development—with equally dramatic and far-reaching results. 



Frank White is the author of The Overview Effect: Space Exploration and Human Evolution, first published in 1987 and re-issued in 1998.

[Photo courtesy of Flickr]


Anonymous's picture

All presidents build on the decisions, both good and bad, of their predecessors. President Obama inherited the commercial cargo program and he could have proposed cutting it. Instead, he threw his support behind the commercial crew program, which is an essential enabler for future commercial space stations as well as the International Space Station. A number of presidents have supported commercial space development with words, but only the last two supported it with serious money. As a result, the door to a new golden age of space is opening.

Anonymous's picture
A good point, Gary.

A good point, Gary. Ultimately, it doesn't matter who gets credit for the policy if it is a good one.

Anonymous's picture

The President also had the advantage that there were companies such as Space X that were established and ready to take advantage of the President's space policy doubtless encouraged by policies of previous Administrations.

Anonymous's picture
Commercial Space

Mr White seems to think like the Star Trek character, Pavel Chekov [the Russians invented everything]; substituting Obama for the Russians.

Anonymous's picture
It is also notable that

It is also notable that commercial space has been in the works as policy since the Reagan Administration. This President built on the policy work of his predecessors, but to claim it as his own is the same as saying Al Gore was the inventor of the Internet.

Anonymous's picture
Space Policy

The Bush space policy devotes an entire section to commercial space. If anything, the current space policy only builds on the policies of the former.

Anonymous's picture
President Bush's contribution to commercial space policy

Michael has a point. The contract for the Dragon was actually let during the Bush administration, and President Bush should receive some credit for this policy change. In fact, this paradigm shift has been under way for many years, as space exploration advocates have steadily pushed the government to loosen its grip on Low Earth Orbit. It did not happen overnight, nor did all the components of the policy originate with President Obama. I focused on the current president largely because the policy runs counter to the public perception of his approach to other issues.
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.


Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy

Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.


Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 


When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.

MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.

Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World


To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook