Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern with timely insights from global affairs analyst Michael Moran of, risk and geostrategy consultants. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!



Politics and Repression

This article was originally published by Coda Story.

By Leonid Ragozin

When the First Cou­ple of the United States trav­elled to Moscow to se­cure the re­lease of an Amer­i­can ac­tivist jailed un­der Rus­si­a’s gay pro­pa­ganda laws, the cam­paigner up­set their plans. He hanged him­self in his cell rather than pub­licly apol­o­gize for protest­ing, though not be­fore he told the First Lady about dozens of in­car­cer­ated Russ­ian com­rades on hunger strike.

That, at least, was how the scriptwrit­ers of Net­flix’s “House of Cards” portrayed the im­pact of anti-gay leg­is­la­tion in Rus­sia.

The 2012 law, which is os­ten­si­bly aimed at pro­tect­ing chil­dren from “gay pro­pa­ganda,” be­came a cause célèbre in the U.S. and Eu­rope. Cou­pled with the jail­ing of mem­bers of the punk band Pussy Riot, it left lit­tle space for any­thing else in the West­ern me­di­a’s cov­er­age of Rus­sia.

Russ­ian Pres­i­dent Vladimir Putin mean­while ini­ti­ated a crack­down on or­ga­nized po­lit­i­cal dis­sent, qui­etly but ef­fec­tively sup­press­ing the protest move­ment that had flared up in De­cem­ber 2011.

The Union of Sol­i­dar­ity with Po­lit­i­cal Pris­on­ers lists 59 peo­ple cur­rently in prison or un­der house ar­rest, and 297 who have been sub­ject to po­lit­i­cally mo­ti­vated pros­e­cu­tion un­der crim­i­nal law since 2008. The list of pris­on­ers in­cludes na­tion­al­ists, left-wingers, lib­er­als, Is­lamists, pro-Ukrain­ian activists, en­vi­ron­men­tal­ists, blog­gers, and many oth­ers, but no one has yet been pros­e­cuted specif­i­cally for LGBT ac­tivism.

Rus­si­a’s LGBT ac­tivists have un­doubt­edly suf­fered un­der Putin. But rather than help­ing them, me­dia hype in the West might have helped the Krem­lin to ob­scure the broader pic­ture of po­lit­i­cal re­pres­sion.

Niko­lay Kavkazsky is that rare breed–an LGBT ac­tivist who has seen the in­side of a Russ­ian prison. He spent 12 months in a re­mand cell with three other in­mates in 2012, and was de­clared by Amnesty In­ter­na­tional to be a pris­oner of con­science. Yet there have been no pro­files of him in the Western me­dia, be­cause it was not Kavkazsky’s sex­u­al­ity that in­curred the wrath of the state.

Kavkazsky took part in the Bolot­naya move­ment–a se­ries of mas­sive protests in Moscow that be­gan in De­cem­ber 2011, prompted by Putin’s deci­sion to run for pres­i­dent for the third time. The demon­stra­tions came to a head on May 6, 2012, the day be­fore Putin was due to be in­au­gu­rated.

The May 6 march was head­ing for Bolot­naya Square, which sits on a river is­land op­po­site the Krem­lin. Re­flect­ing the fact the anti-Putin op­po­si­tion en­com­passed a broad spec­trum of forces, the pro­test­ers di­vided themselves into columns, each rep­re­sent­ing a spe­cific po­lit­i­cal flank. There were left-wingers wav­ing red flags, na­tion­al­ists clad in black uni­forms, an­ar­chists wear­ing bal­a­clavas, and the con­sid­er­ably more nu­mer­ous lib­er­als, sport­ing white rib­bons, which be­came syn­ony­mous with the protest.

Kavkazsky joined a small col­umn that went un­der rain­bow flags at the rear­guard of the march. It was com­prised of LGBT ac­tivists, fem­i­nists, and sup­port­ers of Pussy Riot, who had been ar­rested two months ear­lier. Russi­a’s small LGBT move­ment was di­vided at the time. Its most prominent leader, Niko­lay Alek­seyev, chose not to par­tic­i­pate in Bolot­naya move­ment. But other, mostly left-wing LGBT ac­tivists, such as Kavkazsky, were en­thu­si­as­tic.

Shortly be­fore they started mov­ing, the march abruptly stopped. They were stuck for a good hour. Kavkazsky even­tu­ally went to in­ves­ti­gate. When he made it to Bolot­naya Square, he saw riot po­lice bru­tally dis­pers­ing the crowd and de­tain­ing peo­ple in the dozens. “They started beat­ing peo­ple up,” he re­calls. “I could not watch it idly, so I ap­proached the po­lice and asked them to stop their il­le­gal ac­tions.” A riot po­lice­man re­sponded by hit­ting him with a ba­ton. Kavkazsky claims that at this point he raised his leg to pro­tect him­self, an episode that was cap­tured on po­lice cam­era and later used to charge him with at­tack­ing the po­lice.

The sup­pres­sion of the May 6 demon­stra­tion was ex­ten­sively re­ported on by the West­ern me­dia, but they were less good at cov­er­ing what hap­pened next. For Kavkasky, life con­tin­ued as nor­mal un­til July 25, when he went shop­ping and got ar­rested by agents from the In­te­rior Min­istry’s Cen­tre E Di­rec­torate (the E stands for “ex­trem­ism”).

Ac­cord­ing to Kavkazsky, the man who ar­rested him was agent Alek­sey Okopny, a leg­endary per­son­al­ity known to vir­tu­ally every full-time opposition ac­tivist in Moscow for his thug­gish, heavy-handed style. “He did­n’t threaten me di­rectly, but he told me how he had beaten up and tortured peo­ple,” Kavkazsky says. “Guess he hinted that I was fac­ing the same if I did­n’t co­op­er­ate.”

Many of the May 6 pro­test­ers were ar­rested around the same time. The selec­tion of the pris­on­ers seemed quite ran­dom. There were ac­tivists of all shades as well as those who had never at­tended a protest be­fore in their life. Charges were al­most en­tirely based on po­lice video and con­tra­dic­tory tes­ti­monies by riot po­lice­men, who of­ten ap­peared to see the de­fen­dants for the first time in their lives.

Kavkazky says the agent who ar­rested him threat­ened to have him put in to a so-called rooster cell, where the vic­tims of prison rape are clois­tered “since I was a gay ac­tivist.”

But this never came to pass, and the in­ter­roga­tors he sub­se­quently dealt with did­n’t seem to have had a prob­lem with his LGBT ac­tivism, which he dis­cussed with them.

“They some­times ar­gued with me, some­times agreed. They were re­spect­ful and did­n’t threaten me in any way,” he re­calls. Al­most as sur­pris­ingly, his fel­low pris­on­ers did­n’t give him any prob­lems for his LGBT ac­tivism.

Thirty-four peo­ple were pros­e­cuted in the Bolot­naya Square case, of which 21 spent be­tween one and three years in prison.

Kavkasky has since been re­leased on amnesty, but seven Bolot­naya prisoners are still serv­ing sen­tences or await­ing trial. The in­ves­ti­ga­tion is far from over–the last ar­rest in the case took place last De­cem­ber. One of the Bolot­naya pris­on­ers, left-winger Leonid Razvoz­zhayev, was kid­napped in Ukraine and brought over to Rus­sia, where he claims he was tor­tured.

The gay pro­pa­ganda laws, by con­trast, have sent no one to prison. While the “House of Cards” scriptwrit­ers were busily spin­ning hunger-strike scenar­ios, the most any in­di­vid­ual faced from the law was a fine of 5,000 rou­bles (around $67). For le­gal en­ti­ties, such as TV sta­tions or cin­e­mas, it is 1 mil­lion rou­bles ($13,300).

Ac­cord­ing to An­drey Obolen­sky of Rain­bow As­so­ci­a­tion, which mon­i­tors anti-LGBT dis­crim­i­na­tion, only a hand­ful of ac­tivists have even been fined so far, though the laws have been used to shut some or­ga­ni­za­tions down as well as to fire sev­eral school teach­ers in­volved in LGBT ac­tivism.

Sport­ing long hair and a flam­boy­ant, mul­ti­col­ored scarf, Obolen­sky appears to be cel­e­brat­ing rather than con­ceal­ing his iden­tity. But even he must be cau­tious. He does­n’t like peo­ple to know where his of­fice is.

Obolen­sky says that rather than un­leash­ing a wave of re­pres­sion from the au­thor­i­ties, the adop­tion of the anti-gay law al­tered the at­mos­phere in soci­ety, prompt­ing more ho­mo­pho­bic rhetoric, dis­crim­i­na­tion, and vi­o­lent at­tacks on pro-LGBT pro­test­ers by thugs from or­ga­ni­za­tions linked to the Krem­lin and the Russ­ian Or­tho­dox Church. “Ha­tred is be­ing in­cited and the at­ti­tude of so­ci­ety has changed to worse,” he said.

Real though these con­cerns are, they have had a dis­pro­por­tion­ate influence on West­ern me­dia cov­er­age. Over a thou­sand sto­ries were published on the New York Times web­site in­clud­ing the words “Rus­sia” and “gay” be­tween 2011 and the time of writ­ing, while items fea­tur­ing the word “Bolot­naya” num­ber just 67. The ra­tio is 945 against six on CN­N’s web­site. Cer­tain is­sues, Putin has learned, can bump the sup­pres­sion of dis­sent off the news agenda no mat­ter how mar­ginal their ac­tual im­pact.

It’s doubt­ful that those who first started play­ing the LGBT card re­al­ized the ex­tent of its use­ful­ness. The first anti-gay ini­tia­tives emerged in Sep­tem­ber 2011, when Putin de­cided to run for pres­i­dent for the third time. His popular­ity was at a record low. He was ex­pected to en­gage the so­cially conser­v­a­tive part of the elec­torate at the ex­pense of the lib­er­als, who did­n’t want him back.

A law ban­ning gay pro­pa­ganda was adopted in the north­ern Arkhangelsk re­gion four days af­ter Putin an­nounced he was run­ning. On No­v. 16, the city of St. Pe­ters­burg adopted a sim­i­lar law, which caused an an­gry reaction in the West­ern me­dia. But it took an­other few tu­mul­tuous months be­fore the Krem­lin made the LGBT is­sue a cor­ner­stone of its do­mes­tic polit­i­cal strat­egy.

In No­vem­ber 2011, Putin’s long-time ally Vladimir Yakunin, who headed Russ­ian Rail­ways at the time, took an an­cient Chris­t­ian Or­tho­dox relic known as the Vir­gin’s Belt and kept in a Greek monastery on Mt. Athos, on a tour of Rus­sia. As it reached Moscow, around a mil­lion peo­ple braved the bit­ter cold weather, queu­ing for up to eight hours only to spend a few sec­onds mar­vel­ling at it in­side the Cathe­dral of Christ the Sav­iour.

The par­lia­men­tary elec­tion took place just a few days later, on De­c. 4. Mon­i­tors rep­re­sent­ing anti-Putin groups un­cov­ered gross vi­o­la­tions, in­clud­ing bal­lot stuff­ing and peo­ple be­ing bussed from one polling sta­tion to an­other in or­der to vote mul­ti­ple times. The out­cry on so­cial net­works sparked a se­ries of ral­lies, most of which took place in Bolot­naya Square (where Kavkasky would find him­self in the midst of a crack­down six months later).

Un­prece­dented though they were, these ral­lies were draw­ing no more than 100,000 peo­ple–a far cry from the con­ser­v­a­tive crowd that lined up to see the re­li­gious relic just across the river. It was im­me­di­ately ev­i­dent which ide­o­log­i­cal par­a­digm served as a bet­ter tool of mo­bi­liza­tion. A war of values was born.

Putin set the nar­ra­tive for his pro­pa­ganda ma­chine by hint­ing that all of the peo­ple in Bolot­naya Square were gay ac­tivists. Dur­ing a live broad­cast on De­c. 15, he men­tioned the white rib­bons which be­came the move­men­t’s in­signia: “I thought it was some kind of an anti-HIV cam­paign, that they were con­tra­cep­tives.”

Pussy Riot crys­tal­lized Putin’s strat­egy. The pre­vi­ously ob­scure all-fe­male col­lec­tive shot to fame in Jan­u­ary 2012 by di­rectly in­sult­ing the pres­i­dent in a song called “Putin Wet Him­self,” which sug­gested that the protests made him panic. The gov­ern­ment chose to ig­nore it.

But in Feb­ru­ary, Pussy Riot stormed the cathe­dral the Greek relic had been dis­played in and sang a song called “God’s mother, get rid of Putin.” The au­thor­i­ties de­cided to ar­rest them. The stunt cre­ated reams of outstandingly rich ma­te­r­ial for the Krem­lin’s pub­lic re­la­tions war.

Im­ages of one of their ear­lier protest ac­tions, in which they im­i­tated sex inside a mu­seum, were splashed across the pro Krem­lin tabloid me­dia. Words like “sac­ri­lege” and “blas­phemy” in­ter­spersed with juicy im­ages filled TV broad­casts and news­pa­pers. A poll con­ducted by the in­de­pen­dent re­search or­ga­ni­za­tion Lev­ada Cen­tre at the end of the same month showed that 46 percent of Rus­sians ap­proved of them be­ing jailed for any­thing be­tween two and seven years, as en­vis­aged by the Russ­ian crim­i­nal code.

It was at that time that a fed­eral law ban­ning gay pro­pa­ganda was introduced in Rus­si­a’s State Duma, prompt­ing an up­roar in the West that ren­dered the stand­off be­tween Putin and de­mo­c­ra­tic op­po­si­tion insignificant by com­par­i­son. The word­ing of the draft and the very no­tion of gay pro­pa­ganda seemed so vague that many at the time won­dered how the law would even be en­forced af­ter adop­tion.

Kir­ill Petrov, a Russ­ian po­lit­i­cal ex­pert who works at Minchenko Consulting, a group that ad­vises many pro-Krem­lin clients, de­scribes such laws as “heat flares”–the in­frared de­vices that war­planes fire to avoid being shot by mis­siles. “It’s a rou­tine prac­tice,” he says. “A law comes up, which on the face of it makes no sense and can’t re­ally be im­ple­mented, but it helps to cover up some­thing more sig­nif­i­cant, such as an un­pop­u­lar eco­nomic mea­sure or a po­lit­i­cal protest.”

Not all of the pro-Krem­lin MPs saw the point of the law. “We are dis­cussing is­sues that pro­voke mass in­ter­est be­cause they have to do with phys­i­ol­ogy. I don’t think they should be our pri­or­ity,” MP Vladimir Ovsyan­nikov said dur­ing the de­bates.

The mass in­ter­est only grew. It took al­most a year for the Duma to pass the anti-gay leg­is­la­tion (in­fi­nitely more than other re­pres­sive laws), with every new step in the dis­cus­sion cre­at­ing furor in both Russ­ian and West­ern media. Pub­lic fig­ures from Madonna to El­ton John joined in the cho­rus con­demn­ing Rus­si­a’s treat­ment of gays. Me­dia cov­er­age of the is­sue reached its peak in the run up to Putin’s show­case 2014 Win­ter Olympics in Sochi. Such was the fer­vor of the at­mos­phere that some West­ern gay ath­letes feared for their safety, much to the be­muse­ment of Rus­sians.

Po­lit­i­cal protests car­ried on through­out this time, but seemed to be los­ing mo­men­tum. Peo­ple were in­tim­i­dated by a whole host of new laws clamping down on po­lit­i­cal dis­sent. The tri­als of the Bolot­naya pris­on­ers played out unglam­ourously.

Maria Baronova, once an un­of­fi­cial spokesper­son for the protest move­ment who nar­rowly avoided im­pris­on­ment in the Bolot­naya case, says the fuss over the gay pro­pa­ganda law was largely spurred by do­mes­tic agen­das in the U.S. and Eu­rope. “Putin fit­ted neatly into the im­age of the bad foreign guy who hates the gays,” she says. Baronova is pro-LGBT and was actively in­volved in de­fend­ing Pussy Riot.

The re­la­tion­ship be­tween Putin and gay rights ad­vo­cates in the West is a piece of po­lit­i­cal the­ater wor­thy of “House of Cards.”

Left out of the script are the real po­lit­i­cal pris­on­ers, peo­ple like Il­dar Dadin. Last De­cem­ber, Dadin was sen­tenced un­der the new dra­con­ian law on pub­lic as­sem­blies to three years in prison for a se­ries of one-man protests against the war in Ukraine and sup­pres­sion of the op­po­si­tion. He also hap­pens to be an LGBT ac­tivist, but this is ir­rel­e­vant to his imprisonment. Will Madonna and El­ton John speak out for him?



Leonid Ragozin is a freelance journalist based in Riga, Latvia.

[Photo by Pascal Dumont]


Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.


Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy

Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.


Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 


When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.

MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.

Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World


To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook