Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting
WORLD POLICY ON AIR

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern with timely insights from global affairs analyst Michael Moran of Transformative.io, risk and geostrategy consultants. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!

THE LATEST

AddToAny
Share/Save

"Smart Cookie" or "Crazy Fat Kid": Trump's Erratic View of Kim Jong Un

DMX from North Korea

By Jonathan Cristol

The most dangerous actor on the Korean peninsula lives in a neoclassical white house 5,182 miles from Pyongyang. The North Korean state-run media says that this person’s knowledge of North Korea is at “an elementary student level”; and for once Pyongyang’s state run propaganda has gotten something right. President Donald Trump’s needlessly confusing rhetoric about both Koreas is dangerous and destabilizing; and in light of South Korean president-elect Moon Jae-in’s more accommodationist approach to Pyongyang, the need for a coherent American North Korean policy is greater now than ever.

Last week, Trump said that he would be “honored” to meet with North Korean president, and “smart cookie,” Kim Jong Un. Trump is not wrong. Kim is both rational and smart; but it is one thing to acknowledge that our adversary is not a “crazy fat kid,” as Sen. John McCain once called him, and another to use a term of endearment to describe a totalitarian dictator. 

This is not the first time Trump has suggested direct talks with Kim. On March 3, 2013, he said, “Maybe it’s not such a bad idea [to call Kim]. It’s not a very big deal to make a phone call.” On May 18, 2016, he said, “I would speak to him, I would have no problem speaking to him.” Then, in an uncharacteristic show of modesty, on June 15, 2016, Trump said, "I'll speak to anybody … There's a 10 percent or 20 percent chance I could talk him out of having his damn nukes." This perspective appears to be a relatively dovish approach to North Korea.

Trump has also articulated a different view of Kim Jong Un and the possibility of conflict. On April 27, he said there could be a “major, major” conflict with North Korea. He has also called Kim a “whack job” (April 6, 2013), a “maniac” (Sept. 16, 2015), and said that North Korea is “getting more and more crazy” (July 21, 2016). Perhaps most famously, on Jan. 2, 2017, he tweeted that “North Korea just stated that it is in the final stages of developing a nuclear weapon capable of reaching parts of the U.S. It won't happen!”

Does Trump think Kim is a lunatic, or that he is a sane, sensible leader? This question matters. If he is a madman who will rain hellfire down on the region and the world, then he must be stopped at all costs. If he is a rational leader who wishes only to ensure the survival of his regime, then he can be contained and perhaps even bargained with (though personally, I am skeptical of negotiations). How the U.S. approaches North Korea depends on whom we think we’re dealing with.

Trump’s “honor” and “smart cookie” statements were not the only two ill-advised statements Trump made this week. He repeatedly attacked our close ally South Korea. He revisited his long-standing belief that Seoul should pay the U.S. protection money, and that South Korea was ripping us off through the KORUS free trade agreement.

He said that Seoul should pay the $1 billion for the defense system known as THAAD, which prompted National Security Adviser, and designated grown up, H.R. McMaster to call Seoul and reassure South Korea that we would live up to our agreement to pay for THAAD. It is perhaps important to note that THAAD’s deployment is designed to protect the area in which U.S. forces would land in the event of a war with the North, not South Korean population centers. Trump has sought protection money from Seoul for years. On March 9, 2013 he asked (via Twitter), “How much is South Korea paying the U.S. for protection against North Korea???? NOTHING!" And just a month later he asked, “I ask again, how much is very wealthy South Korea paying the United States for protecting it against North Korea?" The answer depends on how the figure is calculated, but South Korea contributes both financially and militarily to the maintenance of the U.S.-ROK alliance.

Uncertainty about Trump—Will he escalate with or capitulate to the North? Will he abandon the South? Is Trump outsourcing U.S. Asia policy to Beijing?—may have helped lead to the election of Moon Jae-in in South Korea’s presidential election. Moon advocates distance from the United States and greater accommodation with North Korea. A return to accommodation known as the Sunshine Policy may be dangerous, as North Korea has used every past period of negotiation and increased cooperation to expand its nuclear program, but in light of uncertainty both about the United States position on North Korea and its commitment to South Korea it is certainly understandable why accommodation would receive a new look in Seoul.

Trump’s contradictory statements about both North and South Korea have real consequences. Does he consider South Korea a close American ally and alliance partner, or does he consider it an economic competitor from whom we must squeeze every won?

Does he consider Kim Jong Un to be a rational actor who care about his own survival? Or does he think he is some evil villain bent on destroying Portland and Seattle out of some sort of deeply held disdain for hipsters and computer programmers? 

The experts, military, and the cabinet might all have reassuring words for Seoul, but when it can all be undone by a presidential tweet, and Trump takes his advice on the region from the Chinese president and Fox News, I fear that the level of uncertainty in Seoul could lead to a return to the failed and dangerous policy of accommodation.

*****

*****

Jonathan Cristol is a fellow at World Policy Institute and senior fellow at the Center for Civic Engagement at Bard College. Follow him on Twitter: @jonathancristol

[Photo courtesy of David Eerdmans]

Share/Save

Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
FALL FUNDRAISER

 

Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy


Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.

 

Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 

SPONSORED

When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.


MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.


Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World

WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook

FOLLOW US