Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting

World Policy Journal is proud to share our weekly podcast, World Policy On Air, featuring former Newsweek On Air host David Alpern. Click here to subscribe on iTunes!



Burundi: A Justice System Out of Touch With Social Realities


World Policy Journal begins each issue with the Big Question, where we ask a panel of experts to provide insight into the cover theme. The question for the summer 2017 Justice Denied issue is: What legacies of colonialism prevent indigenous peoples from achieving justice? Below, Janvier Bigirimana describes how the European-style courts introduced by Belgian colonizers continue to clash with Burundi's customary justice system. 

By Janvier Bigirimana

Burundi is a small country, about the size of Vermont. For centuries, it was governed through an administrative system led by a monarchical dynasty before being colonized by Germany from 1896 to 1912 and Belgium from 1912 to 1962. The League of Nations placed the kingdom of Burundi formally under Belgian mandate in 1919. The Burundian judicial system has not been spared the effects of these decades of outside rule.

The Belgian colonizers swept away the justice system long maintained by customary institutions, setting up a European-style court structure run by the colonial administration and guided by written law. The pre-existing Burundian justice system had been hierarchical and led by Abashingantahe, or the Institution of Notables, comprised of respected elders who regulated life in society. Thus, legal decisions drawing on foreign traditions were not easily understood by Burundians and did not reflect their lived social reality. By way of illustration, under the Burundian Civil Code inherited from Western tradition, if an item is sold at an agreed-upon price but is lost before reaching the buyer—and the seller is not at fault—then the entire cost is borne by the buyer. According to custom and the Abashingantahe, such a situation was settled by having both parties bear the loss.

In post-colonial Burundi, the justice system is regarded as belonging to the elite—it protects the strong and tramples on the rights of the weak. The current system is costly and unconcerned with social realities. Customary justice, on the other hand, takes into account the social situation of the individual offender and endeavors as far as possible to protect the disadvantaged. For example, in Burundian customary law, there are prohibitions and even severe social sanctions that apply to anyone who violates the rights of vulnerable people, especially orphans and widows.

In criminal matters, customary law values the social rehabilitation of the offender. If a debtor is brought before elders, for instance, any penalties are adjusted to take into account the particular circumstances; the sanction is not intended to ruin the guilty party, but rather seen as a means of resocialization. If necessary, social assistance is provided, and this is usually done with the offender’s family in mind. But with the justice system introduced by the colonizers, the main intent of penal sanctions is to punish. Instead of customary law’s reconciliatory form of justice, the court system prioritizes codified law and practice over all other considerations.

In Burundi, until the introduction of the new Code of Civil Procedure of 2004, it was compulsory to pass through the Abashingantahe before turning to the civil courts for certain matters. The Abashingantahe has three main missions: mediation, conciliation, and arbitration. The Notables make commitments to follow the principles of neutrality, impartiality, and collegiality. But since 2004, it is no longer mandatory that cases first pass through this institution. The political regime at the time did not value its role in the judicial system.

The Abashingantahe is the crucible of Burundi’s values. This institution is thus a useful complement to the contemporary justice system due to its proximity to the population and its reconciliatory approach, which takes into account individual situations and attempts to improve relations between the parties to the conflict. As such, it has become an indispensable instrument in the administration of justice in today's Burundi. But a blend of modern and traditional justice must be supported by political will that acknowledges the necessity of interweaving the two mechanisms for social justice and the welfare of all the people of Burundi.



Janvier Bigirimana is a Burundian lawyer and human rights activist and an East and Central Africa Legal Officer (consultant position at Minority Rights Group International. Bigirimana is also secretary general of FOCODE, a Burundian NGO working on human rights and governance Issues.

[Photo courtesy of Tequendamia]


Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.


Around WPI

Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa 

This paper, “Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenging the Narratives of the War on Terror,” examines the history of Islamic movements in Africa's Sahel region to contextualize current conflicts.

World Economic Roundtable with Vicente Fox 

In this World Economic Roundtable, former Mexican President Vicente Fox discusses his current quest to make his country a hub for technology. 

Intern at World Policy

Want to join our team? Looking for an experience at one of the most highly sought-after internships for ambitious students? Application details here.


Al Gore presides over Arctic Roundtable 

As the United States prepares to assume chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2015, this inaugural convening of the Arctic Deeply Roundtables launches a vital conversation for our times. 


When the Senate Worked for Us:
New book offers untold stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies in the U.S.

MA in International Policy and Development
Middlebury Institute (Monterey, CA): Put theory into practice through client-based coursework. Apply by Feb. 1.

Millennium Project’s State of the Future 19.0: Collective Intelligence on the Future of the World


To learn about the latest in media, programming, and fellowship, subscribe to the World Policy Weekly Newsletter and read through our archives.

World Policy on Facebook