|
WORLD
POLICY JOURNAL
| ARTICLE:
Volume XIX, No 4, Winter 2002/03 |
Print
|
 |
|
|
Friendly
|
The Forgotten
George Kennan:
From Cheerleader to Critic of Tsarist Russia
Frith
Maier*
It has been
the posthumous misfortune of George Kennan (1845–1924), the American
author and traveler, to share the name and even the same birthday
(February 16) with his great-nephew, George Frost Kennan (born 1904),
the distinguished diplomat and historian. By double misfortune,
the two shared the same special association with Russia, its politics
and culture, indeed the coincidence of birth helped incline the
younger Kennan to take up Russian studies. As a result, few are
aware that the elder and forgotten George Kennan did not simply
chronicle Russian life, but became an assiduous campaigner for democracy
and human rights in the tsarist realm, and that he contributed crucially
to putting the issue on the American legislative agenda.
Beginning as
an ardent Russophile who defended the tsars’ expansionary policies,
Kennan became that monarchy’s severest American critic. Fresh light
on how his thinking evolved can be found in his hitherto unpublished
journals as the first American to visit the remote and rebellious
Islamic North Caucasus, in 1870. Now that the Caucasus region is
very much on Washington’s policy screen, the forgotten George Kennan
may deservedly be remembered afresh.
George Kennan
had no royal commission or missionary appointment, nor was he seeking
his fortune. He was born with the instincts of a world traveler
a century before global travel for ordinary people became fashionable
or practical. He simply found life on the road irresistible, and
out of this passion developed a career he could hardly have anticipated.
That his travels would include the Caucasus, barely pacified by
Russia and virtually unknown to Americans in 1870, was equally unexpected.
Well before the end of the century, Kennan had become a recognized
expert on Russia, one whose views would have a significant impact
on America’s policy toward that country.
When Kennan
was growing up in Norwalk, Ohio, adventure for most Americans beckoned
west, toward the Pacific. As a boy he read travel books voraciously,
fantasized about distant adventures, and agitated to be allowed
to camp in the nearby woods. Financial difficulties in his family
forced him to leave school at age 12 to work as a messenger in the
telegraph office of the Cleveland and Toledo Railroad Company, where
he was soon promoted to operator and manager. Desperate to escape
his desk at Norwalk Station, the teenager attempted to enlist in
the Military Telegraph Corps during the Civil War, but was obliged
to stay at his telegraph post; capable operators were needed more
in the large cities of the North than in the army.
When Kennan
learned in 1864 of plans to build an overland telegraph line from
America to Europe across the Bering Strait and Siberia, he jumped
at the chance for adventure, "offering his services as an explorer"
and telling his superiors he could be ready in two hours to leave
for Alaska —then still Russian America.
Instead of
being sent to Alaska, Kennan ended up in Russia’s easternmost outposts
in Asia in the employ of the Russian American Telegraph Company.
For nearly two years, he tramped the mountainous wilds of Kamchatka
and the Chukotka Peninsula, which were then still inhabited mostly
by Koryaks and other native peoples, and a smattering of Russian
fur traders. In small parties of several men, the expedition traveled
sometimes on reindeer, sometimes by skin canoe, camping out through
the winters in temperatures down to 60 degrees below zero. It is
difficult to imagine a harsher test for a city youth whose previous
experience with wilderness had been gleaned primarily from books.
The Russian-American telegraph was never completed (the success
of the Atlantic Cable made it obsolete), but the explorer from Norwalk
had been bitten by the travel bug.
Kennan made
his way home from Kamchatka overland through St. Petersburg, where
everyone spoke with excitement about Dagestan—the new "Russian
Switzerland." Back in Ohio in 1868–69, he plotted how he might
return to Russia, this time to the Caucasus. His interest in returning
was surely fueled by the recognition he began to experience as a
public lecturer and author of several articles on Siberia in Putnam’s,
which the publisher encouraged him to expand into a book. The result
was Tent Life in Siberia: Adventures Among the Koryaks and Other
Tribes in Kamchatka and Northern Asia, which he completed in
St. Petersburg while already on his way to the Caucasus. The lasting
success of the book might be partly attributed to his having "occasionally
deliberately altered facts in order to increase the mood of imminent
danger and create a more dramatic, gripping narrative."
After attempts
to line up a traveling companion fell through, Kennan sailed for
Russia alone in June 1870, with $600 in his pocket. He spent July
in St. Petersburg finishing his book on Siberia, working on his
Russian, and acquiring books on the Caucasus. His plans to journey
over the mountain range dividing the Caspian and the Black Seas
struck his Russian friends as audacious and impossible. They warned
that he would not make it though the wild, unmapped country where
no American had ever been. Dagestan had not so much capitulated
to Russian rule as been forced to its knees; it was a country exhausted
by war, where the "victorious" Russians exercised only
superficial control. When Kennan’s St. Petersburg acquaintances
said goodbye to him, they must have imagined he would never be heard
from again.
Undaunted,
Kennan took ship down the Volga, where he got his first introduction
to Muslim life. "You won’t find these places on any map,"
he wrote his family when he landed at Petrovskoe. Indeed, from the
perspective of a Midwesterner in the nineteenth century, he might
as well have fallen off the end of the earth. Kennan’s goal was
"to gratify a love of rough travel and to skirmish with the
difficulties of Caucasian exploration." He certainly found
the reality of travel there less romantic than the stories circulating
in St. Petersburg about "the Dagestan highlanders whose chivalrous
and heroic courage had won the respect and admiration even of their
enemies." The conversational Russian he had picked up in Siberia
turned out to be "next to useless," for Russian had not
yet become the linguistic glue of the Caucasus. After a week spent
searching unsuccessfully for guides, transportation, and interpreters,
the explorer nearly abandoned hope.
By chance,
he met a Georgian nobleman, Prince Giorgi Jorjadze, who was heading
home to his estate in the Alazan Valley of the eastern Georgian
kingdom of Kakhetia, across the rugged spine of the Caucasus mountains.
The prince agreed to let the eager American tag along with his party.
Day after day they traveled hard on horseback, but in the auls,
or villages, where they stopped to spend the night, Kennan got a
remarkable introduction to life in the highlands. The grueling two-week
journey only whetted the adventurer’s appetite for the highlands.
Kennan had
arrived on the shores of the Caspian with no definite itinerary
but a rough plan to make his way across the Caucasus to the Black
Sea and then south to Armenia. He had a preliminary commitment to
present a series of lectures on his return to the United States
entitled "The Land of the Golden Fleece," focusing on
Georgia’s Black Sea coast. But after crossing the Caucasus with
Prince Jorjadze, he was so captivated by Dagestan that, following
a brief respite in the lush Alazan Valley, he looped north through
Chechen territory and headed back into the Dagestan highlands for
another month. His Caucasus lecture would ultimately reflect the
fact that he spent most of his time in the Muslim North Caucasus;
it came to be called "Mountains and Mountaineers." In
the space of ten weeks, he had described a rough circle about 600
miles in circumference in the middle of the Caucasus, encountering
more than a dozen different languages as he moved from village to
village, and crossing the Main Caucasus Ridge, the physical watershed
and cultural divide between Christian Georgia and Muslim Dagestan.
First a Cheerleader
In our own time, the war on Chechnya has demonstrated that the Caucasus
is a region of world importance that Russians—and the West at large—still
have difficulty understanding. Kennan traveled through Samashki,
the site of a brutal massacre of civilians by Russian troops in
April 1995, and Grozny, whose bombed-out ruins shown on front pages
of newspapers around the world made Chechnya a household word in
the mid-1990s. Kennan himself, in an eerie foreshadowing of the
recent conflict, wrote (of the nineteenth-century war against
the Russians): "What made the Chechenses hold out so long and
so desperately, suffering hunger and peril and hardship, dying,
and sending their children to die, in battle?... It was the love
of independence—the natural devotion of brave men who were fighting
for their country, their honor and their freedom."
In Kennan’s
time, travel was not undertaken frivolously. It took the young daredevil
a full month of travel days from New York to reach Dagestan on the
coast of the Caspian. And when he completed his Caucasus odyssey,
he still had to traverse all of Europe, arriving in London with
only enough money for cab fare and a cigar, before being able to
replenish his funds for the long trip home. During the half year
Kennan was in Russia, Napoleon III had time to declare war on Prussia,
and to lose that war. So these writings, more than just depicting
a jaunt across the Caucasus, form a complete chronicle that conveys
the feeling of traveling around the world to Russia in the
second half of the nineteenth century.
Any world traveler
can identify with Kennan’s giddiness at being on the go, but the
flip side of this youthful enthusiasm is that the journal is not
always well-informed. His blindly pro-Russian bias stands in stark
contrast to his later objective and critical journalistic reporting.
His sympathies with Russian policy skewed his writing at the time
he traveled the Caucasus and for a decade afterward. In 1877, when
Russia was at war once again with the Ottoman Empire, Kennan wrote
a letter to the editor of the New York Tribune in response
to an article noting insurrection among the Chechens and the reported
cooperation of the highlanders with the Turks. He expressed the
opinion that widespread uprisings among the peoples of Chechnya
and Dagestan were unlikely because of what he called Russia’s "enlightened
policy" toward these people. After the capture of Imam Shamil,
the leader of the rebellion, he wrote: "Russia strove by every
possible means to win over the most prominent men—men who might
become leaders of another insurrection—and to open to them a new
career." He was impressed by the Russians’ zeal to educate
highlander boys in Russian schools and saw the Russian influence
as a civilizing one.
Kennan’s support
for Russian actions in the Caucasus, and Russian foreign policy
in general, was in line with popular sentiment in America during
that decade. The countries of Western Europe were critical of Russian
expansionism: just 14 years before Kennan arrived on the shore of
the Caspian, Britain and France had teamed up with the Turks in
the Crimean War to defend the territorial status quo and quell Russia’s
ambitions against the Ottoman Empire. The Caucasian Wars were in
full swing, but the Crimean War was not a mission of mercy by Britain,
France, and the Ottomans to assist the Caucasians in their resistance
to Russian colonization. Nonetheless, the struggle of Shamil and
his fighters was widely publicized, especially in England.
Kennan’s lack
of sympathy for Shamil’s war of independence in part may reflect
sour Anglo-American relations. He was disinclined to be partial
to Shamil specifically because the British championed the
mountaineers’ cause. Relations between Great Britain and the United
States had yet to thaw; in fact, in the years immediately following
the Civil War, Americans despised Britain. The United States, not
yet a Great Power player and not involved in the nineteenth- century
skirmishes with the Ottoman Empire, publicly opposed Britain on
the Eastern Question, the paramount diplomatic problem of the day.
Following the axiom "the enemy of my enemy is my friend,"
when it came to the conflicts between Russia and the Ottoman Empire,
the United States until the end of the nineteenth century tended
to take the part of Russia in order not to be aligned with
Britain.
Kennan’s uncritical
advocacy of Russia’s presence in the Caucasus seems particularly
naïve considering that just a few years before he set off for
Dagestan, upward of a million Adyge (also referred to as Cherkess
or Circassians) had been forced by the Russians’ scorched earth
policies to abandon their ancestral lands north of the Terek River
and in the Black Sea valleys between Sukhumi and the Crimean Peninsula,
fleeing to the Ottoman Empire with hundreds of thousands dying en
route. The dislocation and exodus of North Caucasian peoples, including
Chechens to Jordan, Syria, and Iraq, continued through the turn
of the century.
But Kennan,
born in 1845, was a young boy at the time of the Crimean War and
was evidently not well informed about the details of the decades-long
Caucasian conflict when he went there. The U.S. press published
little on the Caucasus in the years immediately preceding Kennan’s
journey and what little reporting there had been of the Caucasian
Wars dismissed the Muslim resistance as the "battle of semi-barbarism
against the advancing column of Muscovite colonization." During
his travels in the Caucasus, Kennan’s sources were limited to Russian
army officers because few highlanders spoke Russian, not to mention
English; presumably this further contributed to his pro-Russian
bias. Apart from everything else, the lack of any real American
strategic interest in the Caucasus could explain his lack of sympathy
for the fate of its indigenous peoples.
Then a Critic
For several years after his return from Russia in early 1871, Kennan
struggled to find a career in which he was comfortable. He had little
enthusiasm for his clerical jobs in banking and insurance, but finally
in 1878 landed a position as an Associated Press reporter in Washington,
D.C. He had continued to lecture on his Russian travels, having
expanded his repertoire to include the Caucasus, and he contributed
commentary on Russian affairs in letters to the editor published
in prominent newspapers such as the New York Herald. In the
same year that he headed off to the nation’s capital he published
two articles based on his experiences in the Caucasus, but he could
not arouse publishers’ interest in a book on the subject any more
than he could in his translations of famous Russian writers. During
that decade there was in fact still little evidence of how successful
his journalistic career would eventually become, thanks largely
to his experiences in Russia.
Successive
disasters in American exploration of the Arctic (including areas
north of the Bering Strait) provided a new opportunity for Kennan
to capitalize on his Siberian expertise in a widely publicized lecture
for the American Geographical Society in February 1882. He devoted
much of the talk to the Siberian exile system, in the process defending
what he saw as its virtues. Kennan’s lecture career really took
off at this point, but his views on the subject of the Siberian
exiles increasingly provoked criticism.
This opened
the opportunity he had been seeking to return to Russia, with the
result that he became a much more sophisticated and critical observer
of Russian policy and current events. A three-week trip to Russia
in September 1884 had prepared the way for his ambitious journey
across Siberia between May 1885 and August 1886 reporting for a
series of articles in the magazine Century on political exiles.
The articles subsequently appeared in his immensely influential
book, Siberia and the Exile System. The journey was as rigorous
as any of Kennan’s previous travels, and his investigative journalism
changed dramatically his own perceptions of democracy in Russia
and in turn had a profound effect on public opinion in the United
States.
Kennan’s travels
in Kamchatka and the Caucasus had left him impressed with Russian
government policies, and he had subsequently publicly defended the
tsar against criticism in the American press. He was welcomed on
the Century assignment by Russian officials, who saw in him
a sympathetic mouthpiece for the tsarist government. He set off
to Tomsk, Krasnoyarsk, Semipalatinsk, and dozens of other Siberian
cities and towns firm in his pro-tsarist views, but 14 months of
research (10 months of it in Siberia, and some of the rest interviewing
disaffected émigrés in London) convinced him he had
been wrong about the system, and he now saw that the treatment of
political dissenters proved the empire was rotten.
In the United
States, Kennan became a passionate crusader for Russian revolutionaries
and a friend of émigré radicals, including Catherine
Breshkovskaia, Peter Kropotkin, and the terrorist Sergei Kravchinskii
(a.k.a. Stepniak), helping them raise money for their cause and
assisting them personally. Kennan was the most influential member
of the Society of American Friends of Russian Freedom, railing against
the tsarist government in prominent magazines such as Century,
The Outlook, The Nation, and Forum. In 1891,
his outspoken stand against the monarchy earned him banishment from
his beloved Russia; when he returned in 1901, he was ordered to
leave the country.
As a journalist
and lecturer, Kennan reached a wide public. In the late nineteenth
century, lectures served the purpose that educational television
does today, and Kennan was among the most popular lecturers in the
country. During the 1890– 91 season, he set the record for the most
consecutive appearances—200 evenings straight, except for Sundays!
These lectures drew crowds of as many as 2,000 people. He continued
to lecture for over 30 years, while writing for popular magazines.
Much of the responsibility for turning public opinion against Russia’s
tsarist government in the late nineteenth century belongs to him.
He went so far as to oppose American food aid during the Russian
famine of 1891, claiming that it supported despotism. He led a crusade
in the United States in the early.1890s against ratification of
an extradition treaty viewed as a threat to Russian revolutionaries
who escaped to America, and during the Russo-Japanese war of 1904–05
he orchestrated distribution of anti-tsarist propaganda among Russian
soldiers. However, Bolshevism was not the replacement system he
had envisioned. After the November 1917 revolution, he expected
the Bolsheviks to be overthrown quickly; when they were not, he
advocated U.S. military intervention to support the White Army.
While he reported
primarily on events in Russia, Kennan’s interests were international
in scope. He covered the Spanish-American War from Cuba and wielded
his anti-Russian pen in Tokyo during the Russo- Japanese War. He
produced an account of the eruption of the island of Martinique
in 1902, a two-volume biography of railroad magnate E. H. Harriman,
and translations from the Russian of folk legends about Napoleon’s
march to Moscow. He was for ten years the Supreme Court reporter
for the Associated Press. But Russia was his most abiding journalistic
passion, and he was one of few Americans reporting on Russia around
the turn of the century. Kennan’s views were listened to by policymakers
in Washington, and at his death in 1924 he was eulogized as the
"chief intellectual link between America, Europe and Russia
for fifty years."
Something of
his eloquence and his principles can be sensed in this paragraph
from Siberia and the Exile System, in which he sought to
explain the sources of revolutionary violence in Russia, which he
expressly condemned but went on to say:
The [Tsarist]
Government first set the example of lawlessness in Russia by arresting
without warrant; by punishing without trial; by cynically disregarding
the judgments of its own courts when such judgments were in favor
of politicals; by confiscating the money and property of private
citizens whom it merely suspected of sympathy with the revolutionary
movement; by sending fourteen-year-old boys and girls to Siberia;
by kidnapping the children of "politically untrustworthy"
people and exiles, and putting them into state asylums; by driving
men and women to insanity and suicide in rigorous solitary confinement
without giving them a trial; by burying secretly at night the bodies
of people whom it had thus done to death in dungeons; and by treating
as criminal, in posse if not in esse, every citizen
who dared ask why or wherefore.
The bill of
indictment against tyranny, it would seem, has not changed. •
Adapted from
Vagabond Life: The Caucasus Journals of George Kennan, edited
by Frith Maier, with contributions by Daniel C. Waugh. Published
in December 2002 by the University of Washington Press. Copyright
© 2002 by University of Washington Press. All rights reserved.
Frith Maier
is the editor of Vagabond
Life: The Caucasus Journals of George Kennan, published by the
University of Washington Press.
[Go
to interactive
discussion forum]
You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader installed
on your computer to access full text PDF article.
 back
|