|
WORLD
POLICY JOURNAL
| CODA:
Volume XX, No 4, Winter 2003/04 |
Print
|
 |
|
|
Friendly
|
"Let Me
Hear My Brother!"
[Go
to interactive
discussion forum]
What was
scattered
gathers.
What was gathered
blows apart.
—Heraclitus
of Ephesus
(tr. Brooks Haxton)
It’s what was
missing that haunted this American while visiting the Aegean coast
of Turkey, the fecund cradle from which so much of the modern world
emerged. Here, four thousand years ago, in thriving commercial seaports,
ethnic Greeks began using currency, devised an alphabet, drew maps,
composed Europe’s earliest epics and genuine histories, and examined
skeptically the cosmos above and the earth below. In an underrated
epilogue, Asia Minor later served for half a millennium as a laboratory
of multicultural civility. As confirmed bountifully in Roman era
inscriptions, the inhabitants of Asia Minor’s hellenized cities
knew well the excellence of their temples, theaters, libraries,
council chambers, fire departments, gardens, aqueducts, hospitals,
baths, and arcaded markets—the vital and enlivening ingredients
of urban life.
Little wonder
so many travelers have been drawn to the eloquent remains of Ephesus,
Miletus, Pergamon, and Aphrodisias, to mention only the most celebrated
of half a hundred sites. Eloquent, but mute. There is no living
echo from the Greeks who until the 1920s inhabited Aegean Turkey.
They left en masse in a half-forgotten tragedy arising from an ill-starred
campaign by mainland Hellenes, rashly encouraged by Prime Minister
David Lloyd George, to retake Asia Minor. The Turks, led by Mustafa
Kemal, drove back Greek invaders in a brutal war whose atrocities
shamed both sides.
| |
 |
 |
The
ghost town of Kayaköy
Photo by Shareen Brysac
|
Out of the
mire emerged the Turkish Republic, its frontiers delineated in the
1923 Treaty of Lausanne, which also provided for a population exchange—more
than a million ethnic Greeks and nearly 400,000 ethnic Turks resettled
reciprocally, a massive uprooting that sowed enduring enmities.
Given the bitter circumstances, there may have been no alternative
to this drastic surgery. Yet a melancholy silence seems still to
surround the exchange, so that it is something of a shock to find
an unusual and anomalous reminder near the seaport of Marmaris,
favored by British tourists. On a hillside overlooking the lovely
Turquoise Coast, day-trippers wander through the modern ruin of
Kayaköy, a hillside ghost town consisting of 400 roofless houses
and the stark remains of a large Orthodox church. As a marker explains,
with strenuous understatement, "Shortly after the proclamation
of the Turkish Republic, the Greeks living in the region were exchanged
with Turks living in western Thrace, which resulted in the houses
being vacated." One can deduce the unmentioned furies set loose
at the time in the wholesale vandalism that turned these concrete
homes into gaping shells. (It needs adding that the ruins are now
protected and preserved by a foundation dedicated to Greek-Turkish
reconciliation.).
The silence
has also been broken in a poem, "Memory II," by George
Seferis, winner of a Nobel Prize in letters. Born in Asia Minor’s
once most populous Hellenic center, Smyrna (now Izmir), he was a
teenager when his family left Turkey in 1914 to settle in Europe.
On returning in 1950 to his birthplace, he wandered with a companion
among classical ruins along the coast. As translated by Edmund Keeley
and Philip Sherrard, the poem concludes: "I remember still:
/ he was traveling to Ionian shores, / to empty shells of theaters
/ where only the lizard slithers over dry stones, / and I asked
him: ‘Will they be full again some day?’ / and he answered: ‘Maybe,
at the hour of death.’ / And he ran across the orchestra howling
/ ‘Let me hear my brother!’"
This cry of
anguish needs recalling at a moment when frustrated Americans, sometimes
soberly and thoughtfully, sometimes too casually, propose cutting
fractious Iraq into three countries, with homelands for Kurds, Shiites,
and Sunnis. The legacy of forcible migrations arising from past
partitions does not encourage optimism. The uprooted become exiles,
those remaining behind commonly suffer degraded citizenship, as
in the case of India-Pakistan, Israel-Palestine, the two Irelands,
and divided Cyprus. With the welcome capture of Saddam Hussein,
it may now be more likely to encourage formation of a federal government
providing a common citizenship and minority rights for all Iraqis.
And, in the happy event of Turkey’s admission to the European Union,
a more universal citizenship would make it possible for uprooted
Greeks and Turks, or their offspring, to reestablish themselves
in their respective former homelands.
On Staying
Away in Droves
Still, not only Hellenes are among the missing. My wife and I spent
three weeks in Turkey, beginning in Istanbul, proceeding on a nautical
tour from Troy to Ephesus, then continuing by rented car from Izmir
to Antalya. In that time, we encountered eight, maybe ten, other Americans,
two of them shouting happily at us in Didyma, "Hello, hello!
You’re the first Yanks we’ve seen in weeks!" And this was in
September, months before the abominable and lethal terror-bombings
in Istanbul of the British consulate and of a synagogue.
Why the absence?
For years, American tourists have flocked to Turkey, with its friendly
people, its fine hotels, excellent cuisine, and richly layered legacy
of classical antiquity, Byzantium, and the Ottoman Empire. The war
in Iraq has not deterred visitors from Britain, Germany, France,
Scandinavia, or Italy—they were visible everywhere. Why the contrast?
An obvious explanation for Americans’ absence is a wary fear of
being targeted in a Muslim country. A less charitable view is that
Americans are unwilling to incur even the most minimal risks in
visiting countries like Turkey out of excessive and unseemly caution.
It would be heartening if President George W. Bush appealed to young,
adventurous, and able-bodied Americans to defy the zealots, and
whenever possible to vote with their air tickets by visiting allies
like Turkey.
For Turkey,
the collapse of American tourism has been but one more penalty incurred
by two Gulf wars. In Izmir, we rented a compact, Turkish-assembled
Fiat, of which three could be squeezed into the average American
SUV. It cost the equivalent of $80 to fill the tank. Inflated petrol
prices, which bear heavily on taxis, trucks, buses, and tractors,
have been among the obvious costs for Turkey of trade sanctions
imposed on Iraq for more than a decade. Small wonder that the traveler
encounters so few vehicles on the fine and costly Turkish highways
along the Aegean, improved recently to impress the European Union,
and now yet one more sign of a floundering economy. And with the
November terror attacks in Istanbul, Turkey faces an even leaner
year. Is it beyond human wit for someone in Washington to ensure
that Turkey will be at the head of the queue when Iraq once again
can legally export cheaper oil?
The Stature
of Atatürk
The surprise of the trip was the battlefield of Gallipoli, on the
heights facing the Dardanelles, within eyeshot of Homeric Troy, where
more than 100,000 Allied and Turkish soldiers were killed in the months
following the landing of British, Australian, New Zealander, and French
troops on April 25, 1915. This attempt to force the Straits and take
Ottoman Turkey out of the war proved both a monumental Allied failure
and the making of Mustafa Kemal, the future Kemal Atatürk, who
successfully rallied his troops in what a battlefield tablet called
"a sacrificial festival."
The vast site
is meticulously tended by the war graves commissions of the respective
national combatants, its extensive trenches and hecatombs clearly
marked, amidst vistas of incomparable and poignant serenity. But
for many of us, its most healing memorial were these words, inscribed
on a tablet and spoken in 1934 at the dedication of a cemetery by
the battle’s Turkish hero and founder of the Turkish Republic: "Those
[Allied] heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives...you
are now in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace.
There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us
when they lie side by side. You, the mothers who lost their sons
from far away countries, wipe away your tears; your sons are now
lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives
on this land, they have become our sons as well."
What sets Atatürk
apart from the contemporary procession of nation-founders who with
honorable exceptions have crowned themselves liberators-for-life,
was the magnanimity evident in those words, together with his willingness
to risk his political capital on difficult, radical, and contentious
steps, ranging from enfranchising women to changing the Turkish
alphabet. He was inarguably fallible, but how much taller Atatürk
stands than leaders like the late president of Azerbaijan, Heidar
Aliev. With autocratic powers, Aliev squandered his political capital
on securing the succession of his son, to whom he bequeathed Azerbaijan’s
long and self-injuring conflict with Armenia over contested Nagorno-Karabakh.
For years, mediators hoped that Aliev would persuade his people
to accept difficult truths about a lost war. He never did, leaving
as many as a million displaced persons as his memorial. 
—Karl E.
Meyer
[Go
to interactive
discussion forum]
You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader installed
on your computer to access full text PDF article.
 back
|