| WORLD
POLICY JOURNAL
ARTICLE
EXTRACTS: Volume XV, No 2, SUMMER 1998
The "Disappearance"
of Capitalism
Robert L. Heilbroner
What, asks
Robert L. Heilbroner, in "The 'Disappearance' of Capitalism," distinguishes
current economic thinking from the economic approaches of the preceding
periods of the modern era? We have come to view economics as a science,
he writes, and because of this there is an "absence of any recognition
of the fundamentally social and political nature of all economies--that
is, the core of political and social norms that provide the drive
and the acquiescence without which no economic system, especially
if marked by great inequalities, would long exist." There is no
clearer example of this than "the nonexistence in virtually all
contemporary professional economics writing of the essential term
that announces this core in our existing society. That term is capitalism.
"Heilbroner enjoins economists and others to broaden their vision
of the future. While the market will clearly continue play a very
important role globally as well as nationally, "its centrality is
certain to be under increasing challenge."
 back
Rethinking
American Grand Strategy:
Hegemony or Balance of Power in the Twenty-First Century?
Christopher Layne
In "Rethinking
American Grand Strategy," Christopher Layne, who teaches international
politics and military strategy at the Naval Postgraduate School,
argues that although American hegemony may be sustainable for perhaps
another decade, it cannot be maintained much beyond that period.
"Over time, the costs and risks of the current strategy of preponderance
will rise to unacceptably high levels. The time to think about alternative
grand strategic futures is now--before the United States is overtaken
by events." Layne elucidates an "offshore balancing grand strategy,"
the overriding objectives of which would be to insulate the United
States from possible future great power wars and maximize its relative
power position in the international system.
 back
Democracy
at Risk: American Culture in a Global Culture
Benjamin R. Barber
Has American
culture truly become global? In "Democracy at Risk," Benjamin Barber
expounds on his theory of "McWorld," a homogenized state where all
countries begin to mimic American culture. A world of the "ubiquitous
consumer," Barber explains, is a "world without citizens, and in
a world without citizens . . . there can be little real freedom
and no democracy." The danger in America's global culture is its
"indifference" to democracy; its goal is to create consumers, not
citizens. It is impossible to believe society can halt the move
toward a global culture, but Barber offers ideas for making this
culture democratic.
 back
Aid for Peace:
Can International Financial Institutions Help Prevent Conflict?
James K. Boyce and Manuel Pastor, Jr.
When international
financial institutions (IFIs) used their political muscle to oblige
Bosnian president-elect Momcilo Krajisnik to attend his own inauguration,
other IFIs were less than enthusiastic. The organizations insist
they are apolitical; yet, in "Aid for Peace," authors James Boyce
and Manuel Pastor claim this interpretation of IFI responsibility
is a "diplomatic fiction." "Economy and efficiency" cannot be divorced
from "political considerations," they contend. To truly be effective,
the IFIs must consider conflict prevention--even peace--as a condition
for aid to countries in turmoil.
 back
The Denuded
Earth: What Is to Be Done?
Roger D. Stone
In "The Denuded
Earth," Roger Stone, president of the Sustainable Development Institute,
discusses the critical problem of forest loss worldwide. In flagrant
disregard of promises made during international meetings such as
the Earth Summit, logging companies continue to plunder the world's
remaining forests "with the self-assurance of robber barons." Stone
explains the devastating toll that global forest loss--and political
inaction against forest degradation--will continue to take on a
rapidly increasing world population, and offers realistic alternatives
for recouping some of what we have lost.
 back
Therapy
or Democracy? The Culture Wars Twenty Years On
David Rieff
"Only someone
who has never heard a shot fired in anger can take the American
culture wars of the last two decades entirely seriously." Thus begins
David Rieff's provocative essay, "Therapy or Democracy? The Culture
Wars Twenty Years On." "Given the startling rapidity with which
the United States is becoming if not a culture-free zone then at
least a place in which the arts and humanities count for little
compared with commerce," Rieff observes, "any debate on culture
is bound to signify less than its protagonists pretend. The decibel
level has been and remains high, but this is in part precisely for
the reason Henry Kissinger once adduced to explain the viciousness
of academic politics--the stakes are so low."
 back
The New Game:
The Clinton Administration on Africa
Frank Smyth
In his enlightening
article," A New Game," Frank Smyth poses the question: Has a new
day in U.S.-Africa relations finally dawned? The American business
community now seeks to "bring Africa into both the global economy
and the global political structure," yet this is impossible with
several countries still being ruled by terrorism-supporting regimes.
Susan Rice, the new assistant secretary of state for Africa, is
being lobbied hard as the "main architect of U.S. policy" toward
Africa; her challenge is to address legitimate American economic
interests while also resolving lingering issues of human rights
violations in such places as Nigeria, Congo, and Sudan. Rice is
willing to "think outside the box" when it comes to developing new
policy, but can she come up with a strategy attractive to all sides?
 back
Imperial
Shrewdness
Stephen S. Rosenfeld
In his review
of Richard Holbrooke's To End a War, Stephen Rosenfeld, deputy editorial
page editor of the Washington Post, details the pluses and minuses
of the Dayton Accords, which brought the war in Bosnia to an end.
Rosenfeld commends Holbrooke for constructing an "imperfect but
best available answer to the conundrum of what shape Bosnia should
finally take." But what is really needed in such circumstances as
when the former Yugoslavia threatened to break apart, says Rosenfeld,
is a "capacity to anticipate or, at the least, to help treat selected
international disorders" before countries fall into chaos. This
has become "a prime requirement of American statesmanship."
 back
|