| ARMS
TRADE RESOURCE CENTER
CURRENT
UPDATES: January 20, 2005
Dear Friends,
It’s time to prepare ourselves for another four years. Here’s a good way to start - in this update we include a look at some of the changes in key cabinet positions in the second Bush administration, a not-so-surprising account of Inaugural Donors, and the potential next target in the Bush administration’s "Axis of Evil"?
Peace and Hope,
ATRC
In this update:
I. The Next Bush Administration
II. Inaugural Money
III. Is IRAN Next?
I. The Next Bush Administration
While many Democrats are fleeing DC this week - too sad, depressed, and or aggravated to witness the 2nd Bush administration come back to town - now, more than ever, we need to stand up and take notice of who’s replacing who in key posts. Nine of Bush’s 15 Cabinet secretaries will be replaced - from a top polluter taking over as Energy Secretary to an Attorney General complicit with torture and a Secretary of State more concerned with touting missile defense than combating terrorism. This is no time to take our eyes off of what is happening in Washington.
--Former National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice will take over for Secretary of State Colin Powell - from Bush’s foreign policy tutor to close friend and confidant - Ms. Rice will become the 66th Secretary of State, following in the footsteps of Henry Kissinger, the last National Security Adviser to move on to head the State Department. Rice told senators at her confirmation hearing she would reinsert diplomacy in the Bush administration’s foreign policy agenda. She like Powell, is expected to be equally vocal, though possibly more influential given the broad trust Bush places in her. At the same time, given her role in perpetuating false information on Iraq’s WMD, the handling of terrorist warnings before Sept. 11, and the lack of diplomacy used in dealing with nuclear proliferation in Iran and North Korea, it’s hard to tell what to expect. As Tom Barry of the International Relations Center points out, on an initially positive note, Rice’s selection of Robert Zoellick as her top deputy indicate that the ultra-hawks and neocon foreign policy revolutionaries won’t completely dominate the second administration. But don’t be fooled Barry warns, while Rice and Zoellick might not be ideologues, they aren’t moderate conservatives either. For more on Zoellick read Barry’s "No. 2 at Rice’s State Department," at rightweb.irc-online.org
--The day Attorney General John Ashcroft announced his resignation, I jumped for joy - really. Now, with Alberto Gonzales almost certain to be confirmed for the post, my joy has subsided. Senators on both sides of the aisle were dissatisfied with Mr. Gonzales answers during his confirmation hearing. A Washington Post editorial cited his lack of responsiveness to questions about his judgments as White House counsel on the detention of foreign prisoners as cause for concern. The editorial also noted that "some expressed dismay at his reluctance to state that it is illegal for American personnel to use torture, or for the president to order it." Although believed to be less ideological than his predecessor, Mr. Gonzales firmly backs the administration’s aggressive policies and has a long history with the President - back in Texas, when President Bush was Governor Bush, Mr. Gonzales served as his General Counsel, followed by Secretary of State, and Supreme Court Justice. The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) urged senators to reject President Bush’s nomination of his former chief counsel as an affront to the rule of law. CCR, which is the only organization in the country that actually represents men and women who were tortured in Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, charges that Mr. Gonzales knowingly and willingly provided counsel and advocated policies calculated to evade or circumvent domestic and international laws prohibiting the use of torture and inhumane treatment to extract information from soldiers or detainees held in U.S. custody, for more information go to www.CommonDreams.org
--President Bush named Deputy Treasury Secretary Samuel W. Bodman as head of the Energy Department. Bodman is former chairman and chief executive of the Cabot Corporation. If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Bodman will succeed Spencer Abraham, who resigned last month. The New York Times reported that Mr. Bodman will face many of the same issues that consumed Mr. Abraham: the future of nuclear power, the development of clean-coal technology, how to update an outmoded electricity industry and the battle over oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. President Bush said, "In academics, in business and in government, Sam Bodman has shown himself to be a problem solver who knows how to set goals, and he knows how to reach them." He continued, hailing his nominee's "great talent for management and . . . precise thinking of an engineer." Despite Bush’s confidence in his nominee, many analysts were surprised that Bush did not appoint a nuclear weapons expert. Given Bodman’s limited experience in energy policy, some maintain his selection is strategic and meant to allow Vice President Cheney to keep a firm grip on the department. Karen Wayland, legislative director for Natural Resources Defense Council, told Reuters, "I think it’s pretty clear over the last four years that the energy plan the administration is pushing is taking its direction from the Vice President’s office." More concerning however, is the assertion that Bodman’s Boston-based Cabot Corporation was the fourth largest polluter in Texas in 1997, releasing 54,000 tons of toxic emissions. In an investigative article by Jason Leopold, "Cabot is the world’s largest producer of industrial carbon black, a byproduct of the oil refinery process." More troubling yet, Leopold goes on to note that in "October 2002, Bodman’s former company came under fire when a United Nations Panel of Experts produced a report accusing the company, along with several other US corporations, of helping to fuel the wars in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) while he ran Cabot by purchasing coltan from Congo during the conflict and illegally plundering the country’s vast natural resources." For more on Cabot and Bodman read, "Bush’s Choice for Energy Secretary Was One of Texas’ Top Five Worst Polluters," by Jason Leopold, www.CommonDreams.org
--Stephen Hadley will take up Condi Rice’s former post as National Security Adviser. Formerly Deputy National Security Advisor, before joining the Bush administration, Hadley was a partner in the Washington law firm of Shea & Gardner, which represents Lockheed Martin. Hadley was also a co-author of the National Institute for Public Policy report, the blueprint for the Bush Nuclear Policy Review. But most recently, as Rice’s right-hand man in the Bush administration’s National Security Council, Hadley served as the fall guy when allegations arose regarding the national security adviser’s mishandling of information about Iraq ’s purported effort to buy uranium from Niger . For more on Hadley read Tom Barry’s "The Vulcans Consolidate," rightweb.irc-online.org
--Judge Michael Chertoff will replace Tom Ridge as Secretary of Homeland Security - Chertoff's nomination follows the December 10, 2004 withdrawal of Bush's first pick, Bernard Kerik, over an immigration problem with a nanny. In the January 18th edition of the Village Voice, (www.VillageVoice.com) Rick Perlstein points out that Chertoff, formerly assistant attorney general in the Justice Department - head of the criminal division under John Ashcroft - was responsible for the plan to preventively detain immigrants of Arab descent after 9-11. Hundreds of "material witnesses" were detained, and none of the detainees had anything to do with the terrorist attacks. Perlstein goes on to note that in 2003 Justice Department officials recommended that Chertoff hire a lawyer because the program raised serious legal liability questions. Interestingly, Chertoff was the only U.S. Attorney Bill Clinton kept on when he first took office.
--Margaret Spelling, Bush's former domestic policy adviser, will succeed Roderick R. Paige as education secretary
--President Bush on Dec. 13 nominated the current head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Mike Leavitt, to run the Department of Health and Human Services, replacing Tommy Thompson, who resigned Dec. 3.
--President Bush on Dec. 2 named Nebraska Gov. Mike Johanns, a Republican attorney who grew up on an Iowa dairy farm, to replace Ann Veneman as Secretary of Agriculture, who resigned Nov. 15.
--President Bush nominated Carlos Gutierrez on Nov. 29 as Commerce Secretary, to replace Donald Evans, who resigned Nov. 9 to return to his native Texas. A native of Cuba, Gutierrez was chief executive officer of Kellogg Co.
--President Bush on Dec. 9 nominated former Republican National Committee Chairman Jim Nicholson to head Veterans Affairs. Nicholson is a decorated Vietnam veteran and former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican. Veterans Affairs Secretary Anthony Principi announced his resignation Dec. 8.
--The president has nominated Robert Zoellick to be deputy secretary of state, but there are no leading candidates to succeed him as US trade representative. Possible successors include Gary Edson, former deputy assistant to the president for international economic affairs, and Grant Aldonas, undersecretary of commerce for international trade.
--President Bush asked Treasury Secretary John Snow to stay in his administration on Dec. 8, and Snow agreed.
--The White House announced Dec. 9 that Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta has agreed to President Bush's request to remain in the Cabinet for the second term.
--The White House announced Dec. 9 that Interior Secretary Gale Norton agreed to President Bush's request to remain in the Cabinet for the second term.
--The White House announced Dec. 9 that Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson agreed to President Bush's request to remain in the Cabinet for the second term.
--The White House announced that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld will remain in the Cabinet for the second term.
--The White House announced Dec. 9 that Labor Secretary Elaine Chao has agreed to President Bush's request to remain in the Cabinet for the second term.
II. The 55th Presidential Inauguration: Costly but Secure
As Ralph Basham, the Secret Service chief told the Associated Press, "We don’t want to leave anything to chance." "We want to make sure that everyone who comes to participate in these events can do so in a safe, secure fashion. Though there have been heightened security measures in the Capitol and other Washington locations since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Basham said that "this is unprecedented when it comes to the level of security that will be in effect for the inauguration and those events that are surrounding it." And, in keeping with the theme of the campaign and conventions, the 55th Presidential Inauguration is shaping up to be the costliest one yet. Of course, topping the list of donors are companies from the energy, oil, and defense industry. The nation's top three defense contractors -- Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Northrop Grumman -- each chipped in $100,000 for the event, while defense contractor Untied Technologies ponied up $250,000! For a full list of donors go to www.inaugural05.com
Two Great Articles below, one from Knight-Ridder, the second from the Center for Responsive Politics
Big Companies' Inauguration Donations Raise Eyebrows
by Matt Stearns, Published on Monday, January 17, 2005 by Knight-Ridder
WASHINGTON - Large corporations, many of which have enormous regulatory and policy interests in Washington, are paying for most of President Bush's inauguration.
Critics call the arrangement too cozy, while others say the lavish spending is inappropriate in a time of war and as South Asia recovers from a devastating tsunami.
Bush told reporters Thursday he sees no problem with either how the money is raised or how it is spent. "There's no taxpayer money involved in this," he said.
The inaugural celebration is expected to cost up to $40 million, with the money all raised from private donations. That would tie the record set by Bush's 2001 inaugural. Bill Clinton's 1993 inaugural cost $33 million, the previous record.
That amount doesn't include the swearing-in itself, or security for inaugural events, two costs the government does cover. Officials say those will be in the millions of dollars, although they don't know how much yet.
But for the associated celebrating, it's become common for private donations to pay for the ever escalating partying that is the biggest part of any inauguration.
Of the more than $25 million raised so far by the Presidential Inaugural Committee, more than two-thirds came from corporate coffers.
As of Jan. 14, 42 corporate contributors chipped in $250,000 each, the self-imposed maximum donation accepted by the committee. Unlike campaign contributions, there's no legal limit to how much a donor can give.
Financial services companies and their executives have donated more than
any other industry, with 26 financial services firms donating more than $4 million. The industry could reap a windfall if Congress approves Bush's plan for private investment accounts as part of Social Security. It also has an interest in Bush's goal of extending the tax cuts of his first term.
Energy companies and their executives contributed more than $2.7 million. They've worked closely with the Bush Administration for years to pass an industry-friendly energy bill that remains stalled in Congress.
Bush told reporters Thursday that the energy bill is a major goal of his second term. "I feel good we'll be able to get one out" of Congress this year, he said.
The companies call the donations good corporate citizenship, saying they are merely participating in an important rite of democracy and enabling average Americans to enjoy events such as the inaugural parade and the inauguration eve fireworks.
"We view this as a patriotic event and a patriotic thing to do," said Terri McCullough, spokeswoman for Southern Co., an energy firm that gave $250,000 to the committee.
Many donor companies have contributed to inaugurations in the past, for both Democrats and Republicans.
Asked whether it was appropriate for companies with legislative and regulatory concerns to pay for his inauguration, Bush said, "It's exactly what happened last inauguration, the inauguration before, the inauguration before."
Bush said if he thought it was inappropriate, "I wouldn't be doing it." But critics say that for-profit companies don't give money away without a reason involving self-interest.
"It's part of their government relations and influence program," said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that monitors money in politics. "They're doing it to gain access to the White House and to members of Congress."
The access works on two levels, Noble said. First, there's the immediate access that donors get from rubbing shoulders with the powers-that-be at inaugural activities such as luncheons and balls.
Beyond that, it's an investment in establishing relationships down the
road, so that they will be heard when key issues come to the fore.
Major donors receive tickets to elite events such as lunches, receptions and candlelight dinners at which many Washington movers and shakers are expected to appear, including Bush and Vice President Cheney.
Ed Lewis, a spokesman for Ford Motor Co., conceded that the big automaker had a number of interests in Congress and the Bush administration. He said Ford executives would receive access to many inaugural events because of the company's $250,000 donation. But he scoffed at the notion that helping to pay for the inauguration would help buy influence.
"We get our phone calls returned," Lewis said. "That's not a big issue for us."
Wealthy individuals are also big contributors.
Many are executives in the same key industries as donor companies. For example, Houston energy billionaire Rich Kinder and his wife contributed $250,000. Others have long ties to the Republican Party and to Bush and his family through business or politics. St. Louis manufacturing magnate Sam Fox has given millions to the party and its candidates over the years; at one time, he was the GOP's largest individual contributor. He and his wife Marilyn gave $100,000 to the inaugural committee. Some critics object to massive fund raising for a lavish party while the country is fighting a war in Iraq and on the heels of the south Asian tsunami that killed more than 150,000 and left 5 million homeless. Two Democratic congressmen wrote to Bush last week urging him to tone down the festivities. Bush brushed off such suggestions Thursday, saying, "I'm very mindful of the tsunami victims." "A lot of the people who are coming here to the inauguration have given" to tsunami victims, Bush said. "I think it's important to celebrate a peaceful transfer of power. And the money is all privately raised money. I'm looking forward to the celebration." © 2005 Knight Ridder, Published on Monday, January 17, 2004 by the Associated Press
The Usual Suspects, Inaugural donors and committee members include familiar faces from the Center for Responsive Politics, www.capitaleye.org
By Courtney Mabeus and Steven Weiss
December 22, 2004 | Note: The official inaugural committee Web site has updated its donor list since this article was written. The accompanying donor chart has been updated with contributors listed on the inaugural site as of Dec. 23.
As inaugural planners iron out the details of the many events surrounding President Bush’s swearing-in Jan. 20, well-connected donors are contributing six-figure checks to help pay for it all.
The 55th Presidential Inaugural Committee last week revealed that it had raised close to $4.6 million, nearly all of it in amounts of $100,000 and $250,000, from a group of donors with deep pockets and strong political connections. The inaugural committee reportedly hopes to raise up to $50 million.
Although contributions to federal candidates and parties are capped by law, inaugural donations may be given in unlimited amounts. And though corporations and labor unions cannot give money directly to federal candidates or parties, they can help to fund inaugurations.
The official inaugural Web site lists two dozen individuals and organizations that had contributed to the inaugural committee as of Dec. 16. The donors are no strangers to political giving. As a group, they represent organizations whose employees and political action committees have contributed $9.4 million to Republicans in the current election cycle, which ends Dec. 31. Of that, $1.1 million went to the Bush reelection campaign.
The biggest campaign contributor on the list is Northrop Grumman, whose employees and PAC have contributed $1.3 million to the GOP in the current cycle and nearly $65,000 to the Bush campaign. The giant shipbuilding company and defense contractor sent $100,000 to the inaugural committee.
Southern Company, one of the biggest donors in the energy sector, gave $250,000 to the inaugural committee. Its employees and PAC have contributed just over $1 million to Republicans in the current cycle, $192,000 of which went to the Bush campaign.
Altria, the parent company of tobacco giant Philip Morris, has contributed $928,000 in individual and PAC contributions to the GOP this cycle and nearly $39,000 to the Bush campaign. The company gave $250,000 to the inaugural committee.
Individuals on the inaugural donor list include Michael Dell, founder of the Dell computer company; Richard Kinder, the former president of Enron who now heads natural gas company Kinder Morgan; and oilman T. Boone Pickens. Each gave $250,000 to the committee.
Three individuals listed as donors also are serving as fundraisers on the inaugural committee: real estate developer Al Hoffman, CEO of WCI Communities; Kinder; and Dwight Schar, CEO of the homebuilding and mortgage company NVR. All three were Bush Pioneers in 2000 for having raised $100,000 or more for the campaign and Rangers in 2004 for having raised at least $200,000.
Inaugural "underwriters," who contribute $250,000, will receive tickets to a number of events over the four-day inaugural celebration, including the swearing-in ceremony, the inaugural parade and an exclusive luncheon with Bush and Vice President Cheney. They also will be given tickets to one of three "candlelight dinners" on Jan. 19 at locations throughout Washington and one of the nine official inaugural balls, reported the Associated Press.
"Sponsors," who contribute $100,000, will be admitted to many of the same events but will receive fewer tickets, according to the AP.
The Inaugural Committee
Leading the inaugural committee are several people who themselves contributed money to Bush’s first inauguration four years ago.
Of the 14 individuals and couples who sit on the committee, at least seven contributed $100,000 or more to Bush’s 2001 inauguration. At least 10 committee members were Bush Pioneers in 2000, and 11 of them achieved Ranger status in 2004.
Several committee members are large campaign contributors themselves. As a whole, members of the inaugural committee have contributed more than $1.7 million to federal candidates and parties during the 2004 election cycle. All but $42,500 has gone to Democrats, and more than $97,000 went to the Bush campaign.
Business partners Mercer Reynolds and William DeWitt, who are serving as co-chairs of the inaugural committee, are among Bush’s most loyal supporters. They and their immediate families have contributed a combined $298,000 to Republicans this cycle, including $22,000 to the Bush campaign.
Reynolds and DeWitt, who operate a Cincinnati-based investment firm, were Pioneers in 2000 and Rangers in 2004. They served as co-chairs of Bush’s first inaugural committee, which raised $40 million. Bush rewarded Reynolds by nominating him as ambassador to Switzerland, a position he relinquished in March 2003 to serve as the national finance chairman of Bush’s reelection campaign. DeWitt served on the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.
California businessman Brad Freeman is also an inaugural committee co-chair. He and his immediate family have contributed more than $138,000 to Republicans in the current cycle, $6,000 to Bush. Like Reynolds and DeWitt, Freeman was an inaugural co-chair four years ago, a Pioneer in 2000 and a Ranger in 2004. Freeman was appointed to the President’s Council on White House Fellowships, and his brother, Russell, a 2000 Bush Pioneer, was appointed by Bush in 2001 to serve as ambassador to Belize.
Joe Canizaro, a finance co-chair for the inaugural committee, and his immediate family have given more money to Republicans ($285,000), and to the Bush campaign ($18,000), during the current cycle than anyone else on the inaugural committee. Canizaro, CEO of Louisiana-based Columbus Properties, was one of 22 business leaders whom Bush invited to lunch in 2001 to discuss tax cuts, according to Texans for Public Justice. He was also a 2000 Bush Pioneer and a Ranger for 2004.
III. Is IRAN next?
The Coming Wars: What the Pentagon Can Now Do in Secret
by Seymour Hersh
Published on Monday, January 17, 2005 by The New Yorker
George W. Bush’s reëlection was not his only victory last fall. The President and his national-security advisers have consolidated control over the military and intelligence communities’ strategic analyses and covert operations to a degree unmatched since the rise of the post-Second World War national-security state. Bush has an aggressive and ambitious agenda for using that control-against the mullahs in Iran and against targets in the ongoing war on terrorism-during his second term. The C.I.A. will continue to be downgraded, and the agency will increasingly serve, as one government consultant with close ties to the Pentagon put it, as "facilitators" of policy emanating from President Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney. This process is well under way.
Despite the deteriorating security situation in Iraq, the Bush Administration has not reconsidered its basic long-range policy goal in the Middle East: the establishment of democracy throughout the region. Bush’s reëlection is regarded within the Administration as evidence of America’s support for his decision to go to war. It has reaffirmed the position of the neoconservatives in the Pentagon’s civilian leadership who advocated the invasion, including Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and Douglas Feith, the Under-secretary for Policy. According to a former high-level intelligence official, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld met with the Joint Chiefs of Staff shortly after the election and told them, in essence, that the naysayers had been heard and the American people did not accept their message. Rumsfeld added that America was committed to staying in Iraq and that there would be no second-guessing.
"This is a war against terrorism, and Iraq is just one campaign. The Bush Administration is looking at this as a huge war zone," the former high-level intelligence official told me. "Next, we’re going to have the Iranian campaign. We’ve declared war and the bad guys, wherever they are, are the enemy. This is the last hurrah-we’ve got four years, and want to come out of this saying we won the war on terrorism."
For the full Report go to www.newyorker.com
Reports
  |  Recent News Coverage  
|  Updates
|