Best Drupal HostingBest Joomla HostingBest Wordpress Hosting
FOLLOW US

      

FOCUS ON

Illuminating the Arts-Policy Nexus 

Illuminating the Arts-Policy Nexus is a fortnightly series of articles on the role of art in public policymaking.  This series invites WPI fellows and project leaders as well as external practitioners to contribute pieces on how artists have led policy change and how policymakers can use creative strategies.

 

WPI BOOKS
Every Nation for Itself: Winners and Losers in a G-Zero World

 

In Every Nation for Itself: Winners and Losers in a G-Zero World, World Policy Institute Senior Fellow Ian Bremmer illustrates a historic shift in the international system and the world economy—and an unprecedented moment of global uncertainty.

AddToAny
Share/Save

Review: Twelve by Twelve by William Powers

William Powers: In the Thick of It

COPENHAGEN—Under the vaulting sloped-glass roof of Copenhagen's Bella Center, the excitement is palpable. I'm here for the two-week long "COP 15," or the Fifteenth Conference of the Parties of the UN Convention on Climate Change. The world’s environment ministers have arrived in advance of the historic gathering of 110 heads of state coming next week. It's been a rollercoaster ride so far. On Friday, spirits lifted after much uncertainty that any sort of deal could be struck, when a draft agreement that seemed to have some consensus finally circulated. It said that—using 1990 levels as a baseline—all countries together should reduce emissions from 50 to 95 percent by 2050, with rich countries cutting emissions from 25 to 40 percent by 2020. But then at a ministerial meeting on Sunday, the United States dropped a bomb: it couldn't commit to a legally binding target for emissions reductions because Congress hasn’t approved the proposal. Not surprisingly, Canada and other rich nations followed suit, saying essentially, "well, then we won’t either." "When that happened, the whole dialogue broke down," said Papua New Guinea Minister Kevin Conrad, who was present. In rebuff, lesser-developed countries basically told the rich world to "sort out your problems internally and then you come back and talk to us about the things we can do." Then they walked out, stopping negotiations for most of today. By Monday, the conference chair, Danish Minister Connie Hedegaard, had managed to overcome the deadlock through some quick diplomacy. But the peace is fragile, and there’s an increasingly pessimistic sense among a number of country delegates and representatives from non-governmental organizations about the possibility of any significant deal being struck here. The pessimism is understandable, given the vast differences in perspectives. For example, last week Washington scoffed at the idea that there exists a "climate debt" that industrialized countries owe to the world (an idea based on the inconvenient fact that wealthy nations have caused the vast majority of the current problem). But in a developing world press conference I just attended, cries were made for "twenty-four trillion dollars in reparations for climate change damages, as well as a radical reduction of emissions in the North." Meanwhile, 1,200 protesters were taken into police custody over the weekend. Some of them held up signs that read, "Blah, Blah, Blah. Take Action!" referring to the perception that nothing of substance had come of last week's negotiations. Against this backdrop, the world's leaders will soon arrive to try and hammer out the contentious bargaining issues like financing and exactly how deeply to cut emissions. It's only going to get more interesting.

Jonathan Power: The Exaggeration of the Climate Debate

Read more